Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Moderator: Forum moderators
- peebee
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
There is support / need for 32-bit pups. (I like 32-bit because they have a more consistent lib structure than 64-bit where multiple conflicting lib structures seem to exist)
I like incremental, small step changes in developing. The jump from Bionic to Focal would have been too big if I hadn't gone through CC, DD and EE first. Therefore GG would be the next step on the road to JJ 22.04. However it looks like 32-bit systems based solely on Ubuntu components have reached the end of the road with Focal.
Pups based solely on Debian or Devuan are probably the future for deb based 32-bit pups - but there are other DPup developers @josejp2424 & @radky who are better placed to take them forward.
Other possible non-deb bases have been mentioned. I looked at Void and it seems to have a package approach based on providing source in it's repos and then compiling/building binaries locally - this seems incompatible with Woof-CE which expects binaries to be directly available. I may be wrong?
So... UPupEF will probably be the last 32-bit Ubuntu based pup. I may have a quick look at the feasibility of a 32-bit Focal Fossa / Debian hybrid just to see if this is possible - but also may not.
Cheers
peebee
Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels
-
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2019 12:24 am
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
Re: [CLOSED] Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2019 8:09 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Thanks a lot, peebee. Although my usual OS is Radky's BusterPup, I have tried UpupEF and it seems fine...There is support / need for 32-bit pups. (I like 32-bit because they have a more consistent lib structure than 64-bit where multiple conflicting lib structures seem to exist)..
So... UPupEF will probably be the last 32-bit Ubuntu based pup.
Sheldon
Vostro 430: BionicPup64 8.0
- bigpup
- Moderator
- Posts: 6993
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 11:19 pm
- Location: Earth, South Eastern U.S.
- Has thanked: 911 times
- Been thanked: 1528 times
Re: [CLOSED] Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
The things you do not tell us, are usually the clue to fixing the problem.
When I was a kid, I wanted to be older.
This is not what I expected
- peebee
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Just to note that the next Ubuntu version (21.04 STR) will be Hirsute Hippo.
At the moment (11/20), looking at the Ubuntu repos, it looks like there will be a similar number of 32-bit components as is available for Focal Fossa and Groovy Gorilla so a UPupHH+D should be a possibility
p.s. UPupFF+D and UPupGG+D did appear..... https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestypup/files/
Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels
- mikewalsh
- Moderator
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:40 pm
- Location: King's Lynn, UK
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 1981 times
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
@mikeslr :-
mikeslr wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:27 pmWatchdog showed how an acceptable version of glibc can be built into the web-browser, palemoon, with instructions (Import) that it only look within its own folder for glibc. However, I suspect that employing the technique approaches the difficulty of creating operating systems. Moreover, there appears to be a limit on how useful that technique is. No one has published a chromium using it [nor for that matter with builtin nss libs]. And, IIRC, the technique could not be used with palemoon beyond version 27.
I have experimented with this in the past, and to a point, it does work. But, due to hardware constraints, this new desktop refuses to boot any Puppy not built with the Woof-CE system. All my favourite old Puppies are a no-go on this HP; they all declare, at boot, that they're looking for "VESA BIOS extensions"; they don't find them....and the boot process just freezes to a halt. Effectively, this makes Tahrpup the oldest Puppy that will play nice with the hardware......and, due to Tahrpup's glibc being 2.19 (and the majority of Chromium-based browsers being re-compiled for a baseline 2.15/2.17 ATM), usage of the 'built-in glibc' technique has not yet been found to be necessary.
Doubtless the time will eventually come when it is, but.....at the pace of adoption so far, and with Google leading on this point (because with the older glibc/dependencies, more people can still run up-to-date browsers without the need to upgrade everything else to match), Google widens its userbase and further consolidates its position. And I don't see Big Brother scrapping THAT ability anytime soon.
Mike.
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
I go along with what wanderer has posted in this thread. However you decide, I'm sure would be welcomed by us all.
Thanks for all you've done, and will be doing.
- peebee
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Alpha HirsutePup32 (won't be final until Hirsute Hippo release 22 April 2021):
https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestyp ... o/download
.
Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
peebee wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:28 pmAlpha HirsutePup32 (won't be final until Hirsute Hippo release 22 April 2021):
https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestyp ... o/download
.Screenshot.png
Just having a bit of a play with the image
- Attachments
-
- xscreenshot-20210125T171726.png (29.45 KiB) Viewed 6137 times
New Laptop - ASUS ZenBook Ryzen 7 5800H Vega 7 iGPU / 16 GB RAM
- peebee
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Delta for Alpha+1 of HirsutePup32:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestyp ... a/download
4ada7ac4e50ff0c35cbe400ff429749a UPupHH+D-21.04Alpha+1.iso
Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Playing with it right now. Am using the Light browser. Found my HP Laserjet printers quickly. So far, after about an hour's "playing", it is running fine. Peebee-you did it again. BTW-I am using a frugal install, and the Delta1 iso.Thank you.
- peebee
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Ahhhh- haven't uploaded that yet..........soon hopefully
Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels
- peebee
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Delta for Alpha+2 of HirsutePup32:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestyp ... a/download
6b1ec0abd6de1b924ab52328a0b882b9 UPupHH+D-21.04Alpha+2.iso
Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels
- peebee
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Hi @tosim
Boots to desktop fine for me on both desktop-pc and laptop.
Have you copied all sfs to the frugal install directory? have you checked the iso md5 6b1ec0abd6de1b924ab52328a0b882b9
Presumably it does "boot" - just doesn't get to desktop? Otherwise how are you obtaining the files?
Have you tried running xorgwizard?
.
Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
I was just using a different puppy, and tried reboot of "HH" and it booted. Still having problem with sound. I finally got some
sound, somewhat muted, from right speaker, nothing from left speaker.
- peebee
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Delta for Alpha+4 of HirsutePup32:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestyp ... a/download
91ae41fa6f1612c57ffc3ff7d583c918 UPupHH+D-21.04Alpha+4.iso
Please note: in this update Python2.7 is replaced by Python3.9 as requested by @s243a however with this change samba should really be rebuilt but it has so far proved impossible to do this so the old version remains with a symlink to "suppress" some dependency issues. From my superficial tests samba still seems to work, but I'd welcome more testing please. Thanks.
Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels
- peebee
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Next step.............
Delta for Alpha+5 of HirsutePup32 also ISO & DEVX
ISO MD5: a39388c26bf6b37b3c223b4cd754daeb UPupHH+D-21.04Alpha+5.iso
Samba remains as previously - I'd welcome more testing please. Thanks.
.
Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels
- 666philb
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 3:18 pm
- Location: wales uk
- Has thanked: 111 times
- Been thanked: 149 times
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
hi @peebee
where's the devx?
fossapup64 viewtopic.php?f=40&t=88
- peebee
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
- Location: Worcestershire, UK
- Has thanked: 157 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?
Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels