Governor wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2024 5:41 pm
Had you simply made a backup before installing more applications, and then renamed it to the next increment, and rebooted back into the next experimental application save folder, like I suggested to you when you first installed Bookworm, then you wouldn't have much of any issue whatsoever at the moment. You simply could have booted into to the previous version and deleted the newer corrupted savefolder.
Yes, but doesn't that mean I would have to do a save after every single package install, reboot, and then check every program and make sure they all work properly before doing a save? That does not sound feasible to me. The worst part is not knowing what went wrong, so I could avoid the same issue in the future.
...........
Why isn't this feasible? If you save uncompressed it takes literally 10-30 seconds to make a pupsave backup, (maybe a bit longer on USB). My F96 pupsaves are like 1.8GB currently and they back up in under 30 seconds on an ssd drive.
Say you're running in pupsave3, it's working well, you want to make significant changes, you backup pupsave3, rename pupsave3bkp to pupsave4, reboot and choose pupsave4.
It takes a whopping total of 5 minutes, tops.
You can break pupsave4 all day long until all it displays is chewed up bits of screen. Just reboot and go back to pupsave3. Delete the chewed up pupsave4, Do another backup of pupsave3 and try it again. If your second or third attempt at pupsave4 works well for the rest of the day, and you think it's solid, back it up at the end of the day, rename pupsave4bkp to pupsave5, and tomorrow morning bootup pupsave5.
so it's completely feasible, so feasible I wouldn't even think of operating any other way. "My pupsave" is never broken because I have the freedom to break it.
Now I'm suggesting doing it "backwards," right? Backup a save to use as your "next" pupsave. I'm thinking ahead.
You can always backup the conventional way, that is make a backup, keep running your pupsave3 everday, and only backup pupsave3, and have a bunch of backups. But using that approach, best to name them smart, like pupsavebkp30, pupsavebkp31, puspavebkp32, pupsavebkp33, pupsavebkp34... .... pupsave39bkp. But then really, what is the last working one? Well you better tack some kind of identify info on the ends of those filenames.
Everyone has different methods for organizing any kind of file management. You don't have to use mine, you have to use one that works.
But you should get in the habit of making one backup per day, and managing the files properly.
You don't have to keep them forever. You only have to keep the ones you know work, and really want.
In reality, I only have pupsave15, pupsave16, pupsave17 on disk. If I've been running pupsave17 for three months, and it's smooth as glass, I'm pretty sure that I won't need pupsave15 anymore, and I delete 15. I start pupsave18 in motion. Now I have pupsave16-18 on disk.