Stogie wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2024 8:22 pm
Barry, consider a succession plan for the EasyOS project. I'm sure there are people who would be eager to take over if you want to, or ever have to, stop working on the project either partially or totally, for whatever reason(s).
It would suck for the many happy and daily EasyOS users if the project just ended! Also it's too GOOD to end! There's nothing else like it out there.
@Stogie
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I read a post in this forum talking about AI, ( viewtopic.php?p=130418&hilit=AI+LIVES#p130418 )so let's ask ChatGPT...
What could happen to EasyOS if Barry Kauler stopped developing it and handed it over to others, as happened with Puppy Linux?
"If Barry Kauler were to stop developing **EasyOS** and handed it over to other developers, a scenario similar to what happened with **Puppy Linux** could occur. Here are some potential outcomes and their implications:
### 1. **Fragmentation of the Project**
- **Risk**: When a project changes hands, it could fragment into multiple versions (or "forks"), especially without clear leadership or consensus on its direction. This happened with Puppy Linux, leading to several derivatives (Fossapup, Slacko, BionicPup, etc.).
- **Positive**: Fragmentation could lead to innovation and adaptations for specific needs.
- **Negative**: It might result in a loss of identity or confusion among users.
### 2. **Loss of Original Focus**
- Barry Kauler has a very specific vision for EasyOS (experimenting with containers, extreme efficiency, ease of use). If he left the project, new leaders might shift that philosophy.
- This could make EasyOS lose some of its unique features or take it in a different direction than originally planned.
### 3. **Growth Through a Broader Community**
- If development transitioned to a more open community, EasyOS could benefit from a steady flow of new ideas, bug fixes, and support.
- However, coordinating a diverse community can be challenging, potentially leading to a loss of cohesion.
### 4. **Stagnation or Disappearance**
- Without a committed community or team to continue its development, EasyOS could stagnate or even disappear, relegated to a small niche of users and developers.
### 5. **Possible Consequences for Current Users**
- **Compatibility**: Users might face compatibility issues if new developers make fundamental changes to the system.
- **Support**: The quality and frequency of updates could vary, impacting the user experience.
- **Repositories**: Access to packages and integration with other distribution repositories could become more complicated without Barry’s oversight.
### Success Story Example: Puppy Linux
Although Puppy Linux experienced fragmentation after Barry stepped away, it remains a vibrant project with many useful derivatives. This demonstrates that a passionate community can keep a project alive and evolving.
---
To mitigate risks, it would be ideal for Barry to plan a structured transition, leaving documentation, development guidelines, and clear leadership to ensure **EasyOS** continues.
What do you think? Would you prefer EasyOS to become more community-driven, or should it retain its original vision?"
"Live and learn."