After having used and complained about it for a long time, I finally realized why peebee provides light-browser in an adrv.sfs. It is the only application --in fact the only thing-- included in the adrv.sfs. Once you use it to obtain a 'full-fledged' web-browser, you can simple delete the adrv.sfs. No mess, no bother. It's gone, it's desktop file and Menu entry and all links to it are gone. 'Though I still think it should be provided as a ydrv.sfs, just in case you want to keep it as the default for displaying html files.
Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE (closed topic)
Moderators: 666philb, Forum moderators
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 6:37 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 57 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
Hello.
I have installed fossapup64 9.6 and am testing if it works in the Japanese environment.
I noticed that we cannot use an IME (Japanese input system) with Chrome running on fossapup64 9.6.
As far as I know, there are only two puppies on which we can use an IME with Chrome. One is fossapup64 9.5 and the other is jammypup64 9.7b/9.8.
I have long been wondering what makes a difference.
- bigpup
- Moderator
- Posts: 6994
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 11:19 pm
- Location: Earth, South Eastern U.S.
- Has thanked: 912 times
- Been thanked: 1528 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
Frugal install, save folder
When I run the Network Wizard and get to the setup window.
It is very large and goes off the monitor screen.
The things you do not tell us, are usually the clue to fixing the problem.
When I was a kid, I wanted to be older.
This is not what I expected
- rockedge
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6549
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:38 am
- Location: Connecticut,U.S.A.
- Has thanked: 2751 times
- Been thanked: 2627 times
- Contact:
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
@bigpup that is the program was designed for gtkdialog-gtk2 and this Fossapup64 has gtk3.
What works is I copied a gtkdialog from fossapup64-9.5 (Bionic64 works also) renamed it to gtkdialog2 and put it in /usr/local/bin
Then I modified the lines in those programs that need it from gtkdialog to gtkdialog2 because the Simple SAMBA GUI is also out of sorts and the modification to use gtkdialog2 works to fix it
- Grey
- Posts: 2024
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:33 am
- Location: Russia
- Has thanked: 76 times
- Been thanked: 376 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
Wouldn't it help if you change the string PETBUILD_GTK=3 before building in _00build.conf ?
Replace 3 with 2. Or maybe it's more complicated there.
Fossapup OS, Ryzen 5 3600 CPU, 64 GB RAM, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4 GB, Sound Blaster Audigy Rx with amplifier + Yamaha speakers for loud sound, USB Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1 Pro V3 + headphones for quiet sound.
- rockedge
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6549
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:38 am
- Location: Connecticut,U.S.A.
- Has thanked: 2751 times
- Been thanked: 2627 times
- Contact:
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
@Grey Yes that is a good solution to try out. It might work. By adding the gtkdialog2 in this test model I can experiment with gtk2 and gtk3 on the same system. In QEMU I have KLV-Airedale-beta25 going and can play around with building gtkdialog in gtk4.
-
- Posts: 3832
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:59 pm
- Has thanked: 1632 times
- Been thanked: 524 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
Just a couple-few years ago, the WoofCE team embarked on the journey to update PUP programs to run within the GTK3 framework.The WoofCE development group has been active in insuring ALL subsystems and apps are modified to GTK3.
Questions
Would we be helping them by identifying/correcting ANY occurrences where PUP apps are not working in GTK3 subsystem?
Should this be helpful to them?
- rockedge
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6549
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:38 am
- Location: Connecticut,U.S.A.
- Has thanked: 2751 times
- Been thanked: 2627 times
- Contact:
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
Would we be helping them by identifying/correcting ANY occurrences where PUP apps are not working in GTK3 subsystem?
Yes that is a good idea.
-
- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:37 am
- Has thanked: 2203 times
- Been thanked: 878 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
I was thinking about the browser thing. Is it possible to put @mikewalsh portables in a repository and include an install script that downloads, or an easier approach might be include one of them in it's own directory in the install folder, so that it can be used and simply deleted if not later wanted? Like Brave, or Firefox, or Chromium? Is it possible to include one of those in a folder iinside the iso that is unpacked to /home, and then include a symlink to the launch script accessed somewhere in the applications menu? The launch script could open a page in the browser on first run that explains it's a portable and can be deleted from home at any time.
geo_c
Old School Hipster, and Such
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 6:37 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 57 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
thinkpadfreak wrote: ↑Mon Nov 07, 2022 12:20 pmAs far as I know, there are only two puppies on which we can use an IME with Chrome. One is fossapup64 9.5 and the other is jammypup64 9.7b/9.8.
I have long been wondering what makes a difference.
As an average user, I can't think of any workaround. This issue affects not only Japanese people but also other people who use IME to input their languages.
Judging from information found on the Internet, this kind of issue doesn't seem to happen in other distributions than puppy. I hope developers may know something about the difference.
-
- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:37 am
- Has thanked: 2203 times
- Been thanked: 878 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
radky wrote: ↑Fri Nov 04, 2022 2:23 amThe intermittent non-responsive JWM desktop you describe is one I have observed many times with JWM 2.4.0 as implemented in the original FossaPup64 9.5
However, thanks to bug reports by dimkr and 01micko at jwm github, this issue was addressed and hopefully fixed in JWM >= 2.4.2.
I have been running very developed (lots of applictions and theming) versions of fossapup6.9.5 and jackalpup going on three years, so I always wondered about that bug. It's infrequent enough not to be a major concern, just a periodic annoyance.
Is JWM 2.4.2 available to try? I can make a new pupsave and give it a whirl.
geo_c
Old School Hipster, and Such
-
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2020 6:14 pm
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 1202 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
I pushed some changes (https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/w ... 3571/files) to woof-CE:
1. GTK+ 3 everywhere -> GTK+ 2 where possible
2. Some audio-related packages that don't work with PulseAudio are dropped to save space
3. Better selection of fonts (fonts-liberation -> fonts-liberation2, fonts-emojione -> fonts-noto-color-emoji)
4. Fixed some package conflicts (libjack, CUPS filters)
5. Added notification-daemon-stub to make pairing work in Blueman
6. SNS, Frisbee, etc' are replaced with ConnMan, connman-gtk and connman-ui
7. acpid-busibox is replaced with woof-CE acpid_busybox
In addition, I hope to get https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/pull/3573 merged soon, so pTheme can be removed from 9.6.
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
Hi there
I am little confused as I read that there have been a number of changes, yet the 1st post retains the original ISO.
Will the changes made so far be incorporated and a fresh ISO available?
Or should I just download the ISO from the 1st post?
-
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2020 6:14 pm
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 1202 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
A focal64 build with a fresh copy of woof-CE will include the changes, otherwise it won't.
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
I downloaded the ISO and additional files today and installed it onto a USB flash drive. Worked effortlessly and saw the desktop.
I was not able to connect to the Internet as I use my onboard WiFi device which was not available in any of the Network setup applications.
Code: Select all
root# lspci -vv -s 02:00.0
02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless 3165 (rev 81)
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Dual Band Wireless AC 3165
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 128
Region 0: Memory at df000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 3
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Address: 00000000fee002f8 Data: 0000
Capabilities: [40] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <512ns, L1 unlimited
ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset+ SlotPowerLimit 0.000W
DevCtl: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr+ FatalErr+ UnsupReq+
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr+ NoSnoop+ FLReset-
MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
DevSta: CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend-
LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L1, Exit Latency L1 <32us
ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp+
LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk+
ExtSynch- ClockPM+ AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s (ok), Width x1 (ok)
TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range B, TimeoutDis+, NROPrPrP-, LTR+
10BitTagComp-, 10BitTagReq-, OBFF Via WAKE#, ExtFmt-, EETLPPrefix-
I guess I could use the previous firmware to ensure I had a working connection.
- wizard
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2020 7:50 pm
- Has thanked: 2652 times
- Been thanked: 692 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
I may have missed this, but have you and @rockedge teamed up on this 9.6 and it is the one to be submitted to Distrowatch ?
Thanks
wizard
Big pile of OLD computers
-
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2020 6:14 pm
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 1202 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
I'm trying to help here and there, especially when user requests for 9.6 align with my plans for dpup.
- Sofiya
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2021 9:49 pm
- Has thanked: 1477 times
- Been thanked: 1524 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
@dimkr
where did your fossapup64ce-9.6-alpha2 go?
KL
PUPPY LINUX Simple fast free
-
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2020 6:14 pm
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 1202 times
- rockedge
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6549
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:38 am
- Location: Connecticut,U.S.A.
- Has thanked: 2751 times
- Been thanked: 2627 times
- Contact:
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
I am using the latest woof-CE package to build Fossapup64-9.6-CE models then modifying that output and using @amethyst's nicOS-Utility-Suite-2022 to remaster and create F96_1-CE as well as techniques from building KLV-Airedale ISO's
This is model is F96_1-CE, which was built at midnight from woof-CE using the kernel huge-6.0.5-lxpup64.tar.bz2
.
Modified under moon shadows to include JWMDesk-3.6 and nicOS-Utility-Suite-2022.
F96_1-CE uses pulseaudio and includes the latest developments in woof-CE for the production of Fossapup64-CE's and some adjustments to the desktop arrangements.
Ready for testing the ISO resides here -> https://rockedge.org/kernels/data/ISO/F ... 6_1-CE.iso
or https://rockedge.org/kernels/
Keep in mind the desktop "look" features and arrangements are not set in stone nor is any of the system. This release is for testing and evaluation.
For all those Lunatics, Werewolf aware and those with a general interest in Fossapup64-9.6-CE development.
New topic for F96-CE -> viewtopic.php?t=7325
- rockedge
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6549
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:38 am
- Location: Connecticut,U.S.A.
- Has thanked: 2751 times
- Been thanked: 2627 times
- Contact:
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
The most recent version of Fossapup64-9.6-CE is being tested as F96_2-CE and has a topic thread here -> viewtopic.php?t=7342
- pp4mnklinux
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2020 5:43 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Has thanked: 637 times
- Been thanked: 283 times
- Contact:
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic.php?t=7888
I finally go to fossa
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot(1).png (413.33 KiB) Viewed 1588 times
Learning EASY OS https://easyos.org/
DevuanPup XFCE_FUSILLI https://devuanpup.wordpress.com/
f96ce XFCE_FUSILLI https://puppyxfcefusilli.wordpress.com/
YouTube HOW_TO... https://bit.ly/f96ce_xfce_fusilli_HOWTO
- rockedge
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6549
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:38 am
- Location: Connecticut,U.S.A.
- Has thanked: 2751 times
- Been thanked: 2627 times
- Contact:
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
@pp4mnklinux I can recommend using F96_4-radky5-CE which is built with Fossapup64-9.6-CE as the base.
More about it and the download link -> https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic.php?t=7678
- pp4mnklinux
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2020 5:43 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Has thanked: 637 times
- Been thanked: 283 times
- Contact:
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
rockedge wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 11:51 pm@pp4mnklinux I can recommend using F96_4-radky5-CE which is built with Fossapup64-9.6-CE as the base.
More about it and the download link -> https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic.php?t=7678
ok, thanks, I'll give it a try, but can you advance me the main characteristics, plz.
Thanks a lot for your help.- @rockedge
Have a nice day.
Learning EASY OS https://easyos.org/
DevuanPup XFCE_FUSILLI https://devuanpup.wordpress.com/
f96ce XFCE_FUSILLI https://puppyxfcefusilli.wordpress.com/
YouTube HOW_TO... https://bit.ly/f96ce_xfce_fusilli_HOWTO
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
rockedge wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 4:38 pmThis is freshly built with woof-CE using the defaults for the configuration. So far I've compiled several packages using a setup of this and all the runs were successful. Missing is some polished eye candy and several standard Puppy Linux tools and utilities.
Fossapup64-9.6-CE 378 MiB download size
what happened to the above 378Mib version above?
i downloaded the slightly larger Fossapup64-9.6-CE it is 538mb which runs great, see my post for my blurb. do i have your latest version? as some of the links did not work so downloaded what i thought to be the latest, forgive me i am just a bumbling oldy, trying to keep up in this racetrack life is becoming haha Ken
- bigpup
- Moderator
- Posts: 6994
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 11:19 pm
- Location: Earth, South Eastern U.S.
- Has thanked: 912 times
- Been thanked: 1528 times
Re: Fossapup64-9.6-CE built with Defaults by woof-CE
All things to do with F96-CE have moved to it's own section of the forum.
https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewforum.php?f=197
F96-CE is basically Fossapup64 9.6 with a lot of improvements to Fossapup64.
This topic closed.
The things you do not tell us, are usually the clue to fixing the problem.
When I was a kid, I wanted to be older.
This is not what I expected