64bit Puppys for Low RAM update 241024

Moderator: Forum moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
wizard
Posts: 1984
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2020 7:50 pm
Has thanked: 2648 times
Been thanked: 692 times

64bit Puppys for Low RAM update 241024

Post by wizard »

Here is a comparison of ram use for some 64bit Puppy's on a low powered single core 2gb computer. Although these will vary depending on the exact computer, they can be used as a relative reference. Use was checked immediately after booting.

Low powered 64bit computers using Puppy
Test hardware:
Toshiba a135-s7403 (2006):
cpu = 1.73ghz celeron m 530 (merom) single core 64bit Passmark v9=536
ram = 2gb (2x1gb pc2-4200)

Notes:
Frugal installs
Grub4Dos menu.lst file using pfix=nocopy,fsck
Booted with minimal save folder
Ram Used taken from terminal "free" command
ZRAM swap increases available ram using compression, appears to be faster than using swap file or swap partition

ramtest64-241024.jpg
ramtest64-241024.jpg (26.07 KiB) Viewed 171 times

wizard
EDIT:
241024 - add S15 and re-ran all test with minimal save folder

Last edited by wizard on Thu Oct 24, 2024 8:01 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Big pile of OLD computers

User avatar
amethyst
Posts: 2418
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:35 am
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 506 times

Re: 64bit Puppys for Low RAM

Post by amethyst »

S15Pup64 is 127MB and my Fossa Fire (cut-down version of Fossa95 is 121MB). It has to be noted that only the essential stuff are loaded at bootup so these figures does not paint a clear picture as some systems may have more stuff builtin that are loaded as "essential" components (conman for instance). How the operating system will deal with RAM usage during operation is more important.

Post Reply

Return to “64 Bit”