williwaw wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2024 9:46 pm
, I can leave the drive plugged in and just turn off power to the drive after unmounting.
of course it is good pratice to unmount before unplugging or switching off, but there is a difference between a partition being mounted to your file system, and a device being visible to the OS, so I would assume switching off and on should have the same effect as plugging and unplugging
Your laptop has an empty internal 2.5" sata hd bay and a wireless card, yet you prefer USB hubs? crazy
you could get a huge sata ssd to go alongside a reformatted nvme and never have to plug anything in.
have you ever considered a desktop if you want to utilize an external monitor, keyboard, and lots of USB ports?
It is a big deal to open my laptop, but I could do it, of course. I have had a few rather unpleasant experiences in the past. Once, I was using my internal drive for file storage when the drive had a physical failure. Ok, it happens. A few times, the OS (most likely), or possibly firmware (not Linux) crapped out, and I was therefore unable to access my files on the internal drive. I have never found a reliable backup method, and I prefer to have important files on external drives, so they can be easily accessed from another computer if required. I do not use WIFI at home, and I otherwise avoid using it whenever possible. It is a health detriment, which I know from personal experience. I also avoid Bluetooth.
If I can find a reliable backup method with Linux, I will definitely consider using an extra internal SDD drive.
I have a 2G phone without internet, e-mail, GPS, WIFI, or Bluetooth. I can make and receive calls and text messages. If I go on the internet, it is with a real computer with a real screen, a real mouse and a real keyboard, and using Ethernet.
As I remember it, when laptops first came out, they had less power and fewer features than desktops, and they were more expensive.
Now it is the opposite, and desktops have less power and fewer features. Laptops are small, they take little space. I only use the little screen when booting or in an emergency situation when the monitor is not recognized by the OS or the monitor (or connection) fails. I can take the laptop other places and use it. It is highly impractical to carry around a desktop computer.
When I got my first computer, it had a 13" screen. That was the norm at the time. Then, 14" screens appeared, but when 15" screens came out, it became the new norm. Obviously, a bigger desktop screen is better than a smaller one. The next big thing was 75Hz refresh rate which everyone immediately wanted, and for good reason! Eye strain and brain fatigue also come to mind.
BTW, I'm not a "gamer". The last computer games I tried were Donkey Kong and Space Invaders at an amusement arcade, and Pong on a Commodore 64 with cassette drive. There is good info at link below and a video that shows the difference between different refresh rates.
https://cybersided.com/75hz-monitors-fo ... mparisons/
In the nineties, people wanted larger screens and a higher refresh rate. Nowadays, it is completely the opposite: most people want a tiny screen and don't care at all about refresh rate. "We" have gone backwards.
A funny situation with mobile phones too. When mobile phones (they were not called cell phones then) first came out, they were a large "box" with an attached handset. The idea then, was to make them as small as possible. Now, the idea is to make them as large as possible. 
And still, virtually no one cares about refresh rate. I am glad someone cared enough about refresh rate to give me a 74.91 refresh rate in fossapup (just short of the nineties ideal). At least we are "almost" keeping up with the nineties! 