@amethyst :-
It's true. Mozilla no longer give you fine-grained, fully manual control of your cache size any more. What they have implemented is a near-as-dammit identical system to that of the Chromium-based browsers, where you get the "option" to periodically clear data out of the way.
As far as Mozilla are concerned, they haven't 'messed-up' at all. To them, this is a giant leap forward, because it's yet another step closer to being able to compete with their arch-rivals on a level playing field. But as with previous major changes, this particular advance is guaranteed to annoy those who preferred the older method of full manual control......usually folks running older hardware, more often than not with limited resources.
-------------------------------------------------
It's an uncomfortable fact of modern life; it doesn't make a scrap of difference how much RAM and/or storage vendors make hardware capable of supporting. Purveyors of software seem determined they're going to make full use of every resource you possess, regardless of how much (or how little) that may be.....
It encourages scrappy, untidy, 'lazy' coding.....because programmers are getting to the stage where they no longer have to concern themselves with keeping their code neat'n'tidy. Limitless resources, don'tcha know..?? ("Let's use it..!!")
And I fully agree with the OP in burunduk's link, above:-
"I realize that many website developers these days are enamored with the bells, whistles and flashy graphics needed to gain eyeballs and earn something from clicks and click-throughs, but the present-day notion of some endless user supply of RAM grates quite hard with someone of my vintage and experience with computers since the late 1960s."
Mike.