Why is there a fatdog64 subsection? Are certain topics meant to be in one vs the other?
fatdog vs fatdog64 forum
Moderators: kirk, jamesbond, p310don, JakeSFR, step, Forum moderators
-
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:02 pm
- Location: The Pale Blue Dot
- Has thanked: 124 times
- Been thanked: 406 times
Re: fatdog vs fatdog64 forum
Fatdog has flavours too. Fatdog64 is the obvious one, we also have FatdogArm, and possibly other variations of Fatdogs too (in the past we had 32-bit version of Fatdog which we just called as, well, Fatdog).
So the correct place to ask the questions related to Fatdog64 is in the "Fatdog64" section; and in the past I policed the posts and moved any post under "Fatdog" to "Fatdog64". Nowadays we're a bit relaxed since, well, there are other more important things in life than policing people posting in the wrong sections (the only exception I make is the "Software" section, that place is __strictly__ meant for announcing software that will work with Fatdog64 (or perhaps, questions around the software posted there).
-
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:59 pm
- Has thanked: 1704 times
- Been thanked: 553 times
Re: fatdog vs fatdog64 forum
To reduce incorrect posting, should FATDOG64 and FATDOGARM be separated (and 'FATDOG' removed) to reduce or eliminate your support efforts?
I vote in favor of such for the benefit it presents to all; namely FATDOG developers, supporters, and users.