fatdog vs fatdog64 forum

Moderators: kirk, jamesbond, p310don, JakeSFR, step, Forum moderators

Post Reply
je55eah
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 5:27 pm
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 5 times

fatdog vs fatdog64 forum

Post by je55eah »

Why is there a fatdog64 subsection? Are certain topics meant to be in one vs the other?

jamesbond
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:02 pm
Location: The Pale Blue Dot
Has thanked: 124 times
Been thanked: 406 times

Re: fatdog vs fatdog64 forum

Post by jamesbond »

Fatdog has flavours too. Fatdog64 is the obvious one, we also have FatdogArm, and possibly other variations of Fatdogs too (in the past we had 32-bit version of Fatdog which we just called as, well, Fatdog).

So the correct place to ask the questions related to Fatdog64 is in the "Fatdog64" section; and in the past I policed the posts and moved any post under "Fatdog" to "Fatdog64". Nowadays we're a bit relaxed since, well, there are other more important things in life than policing people posting in the wrong sections (the only exception I make is the "Software" section, that place is __strictly__ meant for announcing software that will work with Fatdog64 (or perhaps, questions around the software posted there).

Clarity
Posts: 4066
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:59 pm
Has thanked: 1704 times
Been thanked: 553 times

Re: fatdog vs fatdog64 forum

Post by Clarity »

To reduce incorrect posting, should FATDOG64 and FATDOGARM be separated (and 'FATDOG' removed) to reduce or eliminate your support efforts?

I vote in favor of such for the benefit it presents to all; namely FATDOG developers, supporters, and users.

jamesbond
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:02 pm
Location: The Pale Blue Dot
Has thanked: 124 times
Been thanked: 406 times

Re: fatdog vs fatdog64 forum

Post by jamesbond »

Thank you Clarity. I think it's okay to keep it like what it currently is. We'll respond wherever the questions are posted.

Post Reply

Return to “FatDog”