Page 1 of 1
Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2022 8:10 am
by dimkr
Nowadays woof-CE can build a dpup with a GPU-accelerated Wayland desktop, without systemd, with Bluetooth support via PipeWire, without any legacy GTK+ 2 applications, with a working package manager (+ access to the largest package repos in existence), with an extremely Debian-compatible kernel, and with lower RAM and CPU consumption compared to what you'd find on other distros with Xfce.
My Thinkpad X220 can run pretty much any distro, even with a heavy DE, but the difference in resource consumption, battery life and utilization of available processing power (like the GPU) compared to Puppy is unmistakable.
woof-CE is not perfect, but it can still build a capable, lightweight distro. Multi-user support? It's doable; those who think woof-CE hasn't evolved are living in the past.
Re: Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:07 am
by Clarity
Hi @dimkr
... a dpup with a GPU-accelerated Wayland desktop, without systemd, with Bluetooth support via PipeWire, without any legacy GTK+ 2 applications, with a working package manager (+ access to the largest package repos in existence), with an extremely Debian-compatible kernel, and with lower RAM and CPU consumption ...
Is this ISO available and linked somewhere? I be one to test, report, and use such.
Sure there are others too.
Re: Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 4:10 am
by wiak
dimkr wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 8:10 am
Nowadays woof-CE can build a dpup with a GPU-accelerated Wayland desktop, without systemd, with Bluetooth support via PipeWire, without any legacy GTK+ 2 applications, with a working package manager (+ access to the largest package repos in existence), with an extremely Debian-compatible kernel, and with lower RAM and CPU consumption compared to what you'd find on other distros with Xfce.
Sounds interesting. Where is the download for this distro?
Of course a tiny amount of less RAM/CPU resource usage via a few small cache-saving tricks or whatever won't be important (and preferable to stick to what upstream Linux kernel guys consider best I feel - since I trust their kernel-system-level tuning far more than anyone on this forum), but if half or three times less, then we are talking! Certainly woof-CE scripts have been hacked and modified for years so certainly hasn't stood still, and of course I noticed many additions such as Wayland support.
Re: Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 6:37 am
by dimkr
Clarity wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 12:07 am
Is this ISO available and linked somewhere? I be one to test, report, and use such.
wiak wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 4:10 am
Sounds interesting. Where is the download for this distro?
At the bottom of https://vanilla-dpup.github.io/.
wiak wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 4:10 am
preferable to stick to what upstream Linux kernel guys consider best I feel
I agree, hence https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/pull/3431.
Re: Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 7:33 am
by wiak
dimkr wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 8:10 am
with an extremely Debian-compatible kernel, and with lower RAM and CPU consumption compared to what you'd find on other distros with Xfce
Sorry, Clarity may have been seeking different iso - I was interested in one that had Xfce so I could compare RAM/CPU consumption with other such Xfce-desktop-based distros, being hooked on Xfce for now myself.
Re: Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 8:05 am
by greengeek
wiak wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 7:33 am
being hooked on Xfce for now myself.
How easy is it with xfce to move the drive icons to a row along the bottom (instead of up the left hand side where they interfere with windows)?
I like jwm.
Re: Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 8:40 am
by wiak
greengeek wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 8:05 am
wiak wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 7:33 am
being hooked on Xfce for now myself.
How easy is it with xfce to move the drive icons to a row along the bottom (instead of up the left hand side where they interfere with windows)?
I like jwm.
Actually I don't know if KLV-Airedale arrangement of drive icons has anything to do with Xfce - I doubt it. I haven't checked what rockedge is using to do that. Must be easy to change I'd expect.
Re: Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 9:08 am
by dimkr
wiak wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 7:33 amI was interested in one that had Xfce
The usual recipe (apt update; apt install -y xfce4; echo xfce4-session > /etc/windowmanager; restartwm
) should work just fine, if you're willing to try.
Re: Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 9:15 am
by wiak
dimkr wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 9:08 am
wiak wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 7:33 amI was interested in one that had Xfce
The usual recipe (apt update; apt install -y xfce4; echo xfce4-session > /etc/windowmanager; restartwm
) should work just fine, if you're willing to try.
indeed, will do
Re: Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 10:18 am
by wiak
dimkr wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 9:08 am
wiak wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 7:33 amI was interested in one that had Xfce
The usual recipe (apt update; apt install -y xfce4; echo xfce4-session > /etc/windowmanager; restartwm
) should work just fine, if you're willing to try.
Should move to vdpup thread but just a quick comment that above basically worked with vupup for me, but not vdpup (xfce4 appeared but no panel and something wrong - no time to check further). Also RAM usage seemed high - I tried pfix=nocopy - is that correct way to stop loading sfs files into RAM? - it didn't seem to do anything on either vupup or vdpup
Re: Usability of VanillaDPup with older hardware.....(developer discussion)
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2022 9:13 pm
by mikewalsh
Split off from:-
"Bye-bye, Inspiron 1100.....hello, Latitude D630!"
.....so as not to lose useful discussion material in the middle of an unrelated thread. This happens TOO often with us!
Mike.