Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

I've been playing around with vanilladpup 10.0.24 and made some tweaks and figured I'd post an iso.

Upgraded the kernel with @Peebee's 5.19.9 lxpup64 kernel so I could make my rtw89 wifi work.
build-essential is pre-installed so no devx file necessary.
Replaced the default gtkdialog with one that is compiled with libvte support.
Added ffmpeg, flac, etc...
Added a number of gtkdialog apps that I use.

https://archive.org/download/plinej-pac ... 0.0.24.iso

I wouldn't recommend remastering of 10.x development builds

@dimkr, I like to live on the edge. I've been testing it daily and it seems pretty solid to me.

Wait for build 28 then, it will feature some cool cutting edge stuff:
1. A Debian-like 5.19.x kernel, see https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/pull/3431
2. A sandbox for applications running as spot, see https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/pull/3419
3. Support for dynamic SFS loading under PUPMODE 5 and 13, see https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/pull/3398

More to come! I'm slowly polishing the Wayland-based Puppy desktop and it should be pretty solid by the time the stable Vanilla Dpup 10.0 release is out (shortly after the Debian 12 release).

@dimkr, looking forward to it.

It appears that v...30 is available, today.

@dimkr and @rockedge: This Thread's contents should "probably" be moved to this subheading on the forum.

If you agree, delete this post from this thread when doing so.

It is in the correct location in the forum.

This is a modified version of Vanilladpup that was done by someone.
It is their version of it.
Any issues, problem tweaking, bug fixes, etc.... is theirs to fix and handle.
They know their version.
The developer of Vanilla Dpup does not and should not have to.

The Vanilla Dpup section of the forum, is for anything, only dealing with the original releases of Vanilla Dpup.
New releases by developer of Vanilla Dpup, any issues with them, any bug fixes found, etc...........
That single location, for only talking about what they have offered, is a big help to them.

@bigpup, I don't think @Clarity is using the version I posted at the start of this thread. It seems to be issues with Clarity's computer booting and running vanilladpup 10.x in general and specifically asking questions to @dimkr.

plinej wrote: ↑Sat Oct 01, 2022 1:48 pm

@bigpup, I don't think @Clarity is using the version I posted at the start of this thread. It seems to be issues with Clarity's computer booting and running vanilladpup 10.x in general and specifically asking questions to @dimkr.

Sorry, I thought I understood what he was asking, but I now see he is asking about the original VanillaDpup and not this modified one or is he?

I moved all the stuff about v10.0.30 by clarity to a topic in the VanillaDpup section of the forum.
viewtopic.php?t=6949