Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

Posted: **Sun Aug 16, 2020 9:55 am**

Many thanks to everybody for their thoughts. I'll attempt to draw out some of my conclusions....

There is support / need for 32-bit pups. (I like 32-bit because they have a more consistent lib structure than 64-bit where multiple conflicting lib structures seem to exist)

I like incremental, small step changes in developing. The jump from Bionic to Focal would have been too big if I hadn't gone through CC, DD and EE first. Therefore GG would be the next step on the road to JJ 22.04. However it looks like 32-bit systems based solely on Ubuntu components have reached the end of the road with Focal.

Pups based solely on Debian or Devuan are probably the future for deb based 32-bit pups - but there are other DPup developers @josejp2424 & @radky who are better placed to take them forward.

Other possible non-deb bases have been mentioned. I looked at Void and it seems to have a package approach based on providing source in it's repos and then compiling/building binaries locally - this seems incompatible with Woof-CE which expects binaries to be directly available. I may be wrong?

So... UPupEF will probably be the last 32-bit Ubuntu based pup.

I may have a quick look at the feasibility of a 32-bit Focal Fossa / Debian hybrid just to see if this is possible - but also may not.

Cheers
peebee

Posted: **Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:08 am**

Even though this thread is closed I'd like to say thanks for the work with 32 bit Pups you have done.

Posted: **Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:54 am**

thanks from me too
using upupbb32

wanderer

Posted: **Sun Aug 16, 2020 4:21 pm**

..There is support / need for 32-bit pups. (I like 32-bit because they have a more consistent lib structure than 64-bit where multiple conflicting lib structures seem to exist)..
So... UPupEF will probably be the last 32-bit Ubuntu based pup.

Thanks a lot, peebee. Although my usual OS is Radky's BusterPup, I have tried UpupEF and it seems fine.

Sheldon

Posted: **Tue Sep 08, 2020 6:23 pm**

Posted: **Thu Sep 10, 2020 3:59 pm**

I know it says "closed", however, THANKS for all your work!

Posted: **Thu Nov 19, 2020 8:36 pm**

Just to note that the next Ubuntu version (21.04 STR) will be Hirsute Hippo.

At the moment (11/20), looking at the Ubuntu repos, it looks like there will be a similar number of 32-bit components as is available for Focal Fossa and Groovy Gorilla so a UPupHH+D should be a possibility

p.s. UPupFF+D and UPupGG+D did appear..... https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestypup/files/

Posted: **Tue Dec 15, 2020 3:26 pm**

@mikeslr :-

mikeslr wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:27 pm
Watchdog showed how an acceptable version of glibc can be built into the web-browser, palemoon, with instructions (Import) that it only look within its own folder for glibc. However, I suspect that employing the technique approaches the difficulty of creating operating systems. Moreover, there appears to be a limit on how useful that technique is. No one has published a chromium using it [nor for that matter with builtin nss libs]. And, IIRC, the technique could not be used with palemoon beyond version 27.

I have experimented with this in the past, and to a point, it does work. But, due to hardware constraints, this new desktop refuses to boot any Puppy not built with the Woof-CE system. All my favourite old Puppies are a no-go on this HP; they all declare, at boot, that they're looking for "VESA BIOS extensions"; they don't find them....and the boot process just freezes to a halt. Effectively, this makes Tahrpup the oldest Puppy that will play nice with the hardware......and, due to Tahrpup's glibc being 2.19 (and the majority of Chromium-based browsers being re-compiled for a baseline 2.15/2.17 ATM), usage of the 'built-in glibc' technique has not yet been found to be necessary.

Doubtless the time will eventually come when it is, but.....at the pace of adoption so far, and with Google leading on this point (because with the older glibc/dependencies, more people can still run up-to-date browsers without the need to upgrade everything else to match), Google widens its userbase and further consolidates its position. And I don't see Big Brother scrapping THAT ability anytime soon.

Mike.

Posted: **Sun Jan 24, 2021 4:59 pm**

I go along with what wanderer has posted in this thread. However you decide, I'm sure would be welcomed by us all.
Thanks for all you've done, and will be doing.

Posted: **Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:28 pm**

Alpha HirsutePup32 (won't be final until Hirsute Hippo release 22 April 2021):

https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestyp ... o/download
.

: Screenshot.png (151.48 KiB) Viewed 5020 times

Posted: **Mon Jan 25, 2021 10:35 pm**

peebee wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:28 pm
Alpha HirsutePup32 (won't be final until Hirsute Hippo release 22 April 2021):

https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestyp ... o/download
.

Screenshot.png

Just having a bit of a play with the image

Posted: **Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:09 pm**

Delta for Alpha+1 of HirsutePup32:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestyp ... a/download

4ada7ac4e50ff0c35cbe400ff429749a UPupHH+D-21.04Alpha+1.iso

Posted: **Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:48 pm**

Thanks.Will dl, and check it out.

Posted: **Sat Feb 06, 2021 5:10 pm**

A play on TerryH's play:

: Hirsute-Hippo.png (148.31 KiB) Viewed 5144 times

Posted: **Sat Feb 06, 2021 9:24 pm**

Playing with it right now. Am using the Light browser. Found my HP Laserjet printers quickly. So far, after about an hour's "playing", it is running fine. Peebee-you did it again. BTW-I am using a frugal install, and the Delta1 iso.Thank you.

Posted: **Tue Feb 16, 2021 8:26 pm**

Addendum to above:

: Screenshot.jpg (35.78 KiB) Viewed 5078 times

Anybody else having this problem?

Posted: **Tue Feb 16, 2021 10:38 pm**

tosim wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 8:26 pm
Anybody else having this problem?

Ahhhh- haven't uploaded that yet..........soon hopefully

Posted: **Wed Feb 17, 2021 4:41 pm**

I, and probably many others, are eagerly awaiting it. Thank you again.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:24 pm**

Delta for Alpha+2 of HirsutePup32:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestyp ... a/download

6b1ec0abd6de1b924ab52328a0b882b9 UPupHH+D-21.04Alpha+2.iso

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:59 pm**

Got it, and will try it out. Thanks.

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:00 pm**

Would not boot after I applied the delta2

dmesg.txt: (43.29 KiB) Downloaded 79 times

dmesg.txt: (43.29 KiB) Downloaded 79 times

probedisk.log: (121 Bytes) Downloaded 64 times

bootinit.log: (196 Bytes) Downloaded 73 times

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:03 pm**

Additional files:

sys.log: (69.48 KiB) Downloaded 64 times

probepart.log: (124 Bytes) Downloaded 68 times

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:53 pm**

Hi @tosim

Boots to desktop fine for me on both desktop-pc and laptop.

Have you copied all sfs to the frugal install directory? have you checked the iso md5 6b1ec0abd6de1b924ab52328a0b882b9

Presumably it does "boot" - just doesn't get to desktop? Otherwise how are you obtaining the files?

Have you tried running xorgwizard?
.

: Screenshot.png (162.02 KiB) Viewed 5232 times

Posted: **Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:50 pm**

: uhh.png (24.36 KiB) Viewed 5224 times

I was just using a different puppy, and tried reboot of "HH" and it booted. Still having problem with sound. I finally got some
sound, somewhat muted, from right speaker, nothing from left speaker.

Posted: **Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:49 pm**

Delta for Alpha+4 of HirsutePup32:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/zestyp ... a/download

91ae41fa6f1612c57ffc3ff7d583c918 UPupHH+D-21.04Alpha+4.iso

Please note: in this update Python2.7 is replaced by Python3.9 as requested by @s243a however with this change samba should really be rebuilt but it has so far proved impossible to do this so the old version remains with a symlink to "suppress" some dependency issues. From my superficial tests samba still seems to work, but I'd welcome more testing please. Thanks.

Posted: **Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:39 pm**

Have now got it dl'd. Will "play" with it later. Thank you.

Posted: **Sat Mar 27, 2021 12:17 pm**

Next step.............

Delta for Alpha+5 of HirsutePup32 also ISO & DEVX

ISO MD5: a39388c26bf6b37b3c223b4cd754daeb UPupHH+D-21.04Alpha+5.iso

Samba remains as previously - I'd welcome more testing please. Thanks.
.

: Screenshot.png (242.7 KiB) Viewed 5270 times

Posted: **Sat Mar 27, 2021 3:22 pm**

Will do, at least I'll try to. Thanks.

Posted: **Sat Mar 27, 2021 6:12 pm**

hi @peebee

where's the devx?

Posted: **Sat Mar 27, 2021 6:57 pm**

666philb wrote: ↑Sat Mar 27, 2021 6:12 pm
hi @peebee

where's the devx?

Same link above.....

Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: [CLOSED] Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: [CLOSED] Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: [CLOSED] Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next? (Closed)

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?

Re: Discussion: Where should UPup32 go next?