Feek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 7:53 am
I think I understand your way of accessing the drives/partitions. It´s similar as in Windows, where all partitions are mounted by default and are available e.g. in total commander.
I hadn't thought of this before now, but strangely Redmond partitions can appear invisible in the gui by not assigning/removing a drive letter.
Is that the same as being unmounted? Not sure.
There are also 'hidden' partitions that Linux puts out there in the open, which is why we have these partition discussions.
On the one hand, we want the power to access them. On the other, they're hidden for a reason.
Seeing them all I can do is screw them up. Redmond expects TWO to recover the os, in addition to the third for boot.
On an old MBR format disk, that gives us one partition to play with if we don't make it extended.
I must say that when I booted puppy the first time, the partitions on the desktop were a bit confusing to me first. But later I found them very practical and effective.
Pinboard/Rox partitions are one of its best features, a rare knock being your question here. I like them too with mixed feelings, mostly related to clutter and these hacks. The image is how it beats XFCE.
If there's a way to remove individual XFCE partitions, I haven't seen it yet. It's all or nothing. "Properties" is just basic partition info: name/size/usage/location/last accessed+modified, plus Emblems and Permissions.
"Open" mounts and opens Thunar vs. "Mount" just mounting. I always remove them (just a demo here). JWM wins!
It is meant in this sentence, that I want to have real icons for the partitions on the desktop, not just folders dragged from rox (as you previously suggested).
I appreciate preference, but I also don't understand why it matters save small factors like automated arrangement & the right-click menu. Sometimes I set it up differently, but you can see the green light on manually dragged launch folders.
I would use Mr. Bert's technical advice too but it's tailored to one specific system. I'm working on generic (portable) live boots that will be customized by accessing scripts on local partitions. I can't think of a better way.
I appreciate the nod. It's obviously different being a coder and Puppy user with years experience.