O-kay. As I get to share on occasion, I was driven here by Mint, and to Mint by the final straw of not having access to Windows installation media on a machine bought with Windows pre-installed.
Mint was crashing, buggy, and I believe that had largely to do with system resources and pressing to be installed. It doesn't run live as well as Puppy.
There were other little things, like I came across two package installers, neither as good as quickpet or ppm.
Alas it comes in three desktop environments and though I like MATE best aesthetically, there is a reason XFCE is #1. It's a combination of refinement, usability and light-weight. I'm in it now because this machine is so fast it doesn't need JWM and I'm trying to ween off USB to live usage and it takes longer to customize JWM for live use.
Re. interest, I believe there's great potential both in increasing Linux's percent of pc installations AND Puppy's rank. In Economics we'd call it market share and growing the market, and look upon both favorably (i.e., resources would go there).
I also see central users are personally enthusiastic but do not care about expanding usage and are fairly chauvinistic about how it is used, as written on in my two posts on pg. 3 of Re: What if Puppy no longer worked?
There's pretense of the opposite, e.g., you are free to customize and use all the options, but ultimately you are the master of your desktop and we won't appeal to friendliness or popularity.
I would be interested expansion, but only if others cared. There would have to be another incentive that is not financial. I agree that you want a greater community pool to draw upon for support.
There is a great learning curve. It is not impossibly great but extremely time demanding.
I care about both users numbers and fix-it commiseration. They're correlated. I want the best tools most prominent, and I think Microsoft's model is harmful.
I've booted about a dozen Puppy versions but lately it's been just four, and if I were just 64-bit it would be two, Xenial JWM & XFCE. What's counted? What should be?
Mike3 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 01, 2021 9:25 am
@JASpup, are you refering to me? In my country there is a saying that goes a bit like: "talk out from the beard", which means kinda speak your mind, don't be vague, say what you want to say clearly. Vague implicit accusations is something I don't appreciate. So let me "speak out from the beard": I have no hidden agenda whatsoever to ask what others here think about the numbers using Puppy. I do not in any way work for a large corporation that would want this kind of information. I am a very very very totally honest person I hate all kinds of spying and hidden agendas. Also, why would any large corporation or anyone dishonest care about Puppy Linux, there ain't many users of it compared to other Linux distros and Linux is only used by like 2 % of PC's. So I do not think there is great interest to be honest. And I would assume there would be even less interest in Puppy, given that for example on distrowatch it is like at place number 18 in popularity (I guess based on how many visitors check the page regarding it there, not downloads or amount of users), way behind Ubunty, Fedora, Debian, Mint and MX Linux for example. My reason for opening the subject is I think it's kinda interesting how many people would use an OS like Puppy.
For me there was quite a learning curve.
And personally I don't care for many people using the same OS as I use. One reason would be to have good community where one can ask questions and solve issues and the like.
But it is still interesting and I assume a lot of the people who put up versions for downloads are active here, so they would know approximately how many people have downloaded the .iso files, which would be an indication. But then also they could share the .iso or decide not to run Puppy after having tried it out or something. But then some people could be using old versions, but then app support would be limited I suppose, compared to something like windows or MacOS where you can often use new apps on older OS versions. Again, I don't mind this.
And sure there may be more users than forum members. But me, starting out I needed to ask quite few questions to get going and I have a lot experience with computers and the like. And this forum has only got like 1'500 members. With ten times as many people visiting sure there may have been 20'000 people or more checking out this forum. But sure there may be users around that don't need to check the forum or may have gained knowledge from the old forum or something (or registered users that don't bother to login), but that was down for quite a while so I guess for new users to find out about things they would have to visit this forum, that at it's peak has had 107 visitors at the same time. But even if we assume that only one in four users would visit a forum to get info during like a year, that would still be around 80'000 which was my guess maybe.
I guess one reason for caring about numbers is that there is enough people involved, so that there is a community which does help with an OS like Puppy. And also that there is continued development.