Tested LxPupSc64 version 22.02 +4.
First a kernel note: 5.19.0 is running flawlessly on LxPupSc64 22.02 +2. VoidPup64 22.02 +8, and fossupup64 9.5 on my i5 based Fujitsu S761.
LxPupSc64 22.02 +4 iso generated using the delta and md5sum checked. Install then done, frugal to SSD on the usual Fujitsu S661 laptop. Tested as pristine install first, set up through touchpad config and SNS internet connection using the kernel supported Atheros card. Then as a 'quasi pristine install' using the 5.19.0 kernel, then as an update to my 22.02 +2 install, both with the stock 5.16.7 kernel and with the 5.19.0 kernel.
In all cases, clean boot, clean dmesg, intel video driver used, Atheros card internet connection fine, and normal light use (browser, mail, geany, pcmanfm etc.) is ok.
One thing of note: In 22.02 +4 (both pristine and updates, both kernels, same theme) the idle resource use is much poorer (5% or 6% CPU use vs 1% for 22.02 +2 and memory use roughly 290MB vs 225MB for 22.02 +2). glxgears FPS also is measurably lower in 22.02 +4 (6xxx vs 9xxx in 22.02 +2), also kernel independent.
Looking at lxtask, at idle in 22.02 +2, only lxtask itself shows any CPU %, roughly 1% with a 5 sec update setting. In 22.02 +4 Xorg uses a pretty constant 3% to 4%, then lxtask at 1%. Kernel and install type independent again.
I'm using VoidPup64 pretty much exclusively as my daily now but I'll leave LxPupSc64 at version 22.02 +4 on my personal computer for now in case I want to futz with it. Other supported laptops will stay at 22.02 +2. 22.02 +2 seems happier than 22.02 +4 on this hardware anyway for now.
Cheers,
Update as of October 27,2022: Kernel bumped from 6.02 to 6.05 in LxPupSc64 22.02 +2, +4, +5 and in Voidpup64 22.02 +10c. All frugal installs on the i5 based Fujitsu laptops. Boots are clean in all, no dmesg failures and just the usual expected warnings. Using VoidPup64 +10c with 6.0.5 as my daily with LxPupSc64 22.02 +2 for some other users and some scanning and printing chores. Idle resource is excellent in VoidPup64 +10c and in LxPupSc64 22.02 +2, and glxgears in that LxPupSc64 is stellar.
I still have the higher idle resource use in LxPupSc 22.02 +4 and +5 with notably lower glxgears FPS in those. Two differences noted in them: xorg continues to show up top dog in lxtask using 5% or 6% of CPU, and at boot "making file system usable..." is a 'failure', not 'done' as in +2 or Voidpup. In spite of that; daily operation, saves, reboots, are fine?? I've ruled out any kernel dependence and looked at rc.sysinit changes, xorg, the bootsysinit logs, and have gotten nowhere. The change is definitely between +2 and +4.
Keeping on keeping on with LxPupSc64 +2 and Voidpup64 +10c, both with the 6.05 kernel.
Thanks,