aufs future

Moderator: Forum moderators

User avatar
greengeek
Posts: 1570
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 11:06 pm
Has thanked: 673 times
Been thanked: 238 times

Re: aufs future

Post by greengeek »

Does anybody still trust the global software and hardware developers?

Given the eternal "Windows Updating" and "Android Updating" carousel - does anyone now believe in the "Linux Updating" carousel?

ozsouth
Posts: 1740
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2020 2:38 am
Location: S.E. Australia
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 798 times

Re: aufs future

Post by ozsouth »

I only make aufs kernels for others. Since the last Fossa-Low I made is overlay-capable & I made an s15pup32 simple-overlay as well as the s15pup64 versions, I personally have no use for aufs. More & more folk I share simple-overlay options with are seeing they don't really need aufs.

dimkr
Posts: 2541
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2020 6:14 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 1292 times

Re: aufs future

Post by dimkr »

greengeek wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 9:21 am

Given the eternal "Windows Updating" and "Android Updating" carousel - does anyone now believe in the "Linux Updating" carousel?

"Longterm" kernels like 6.1.x and 6.6.x exist specifically for people and organizations that don't want to update to a newer version with additional features, which also adds new bugs and new security issues. These kernels give you a time window of several years, where you get only fixes and don't need to be on the "carousel" like those constantly chasing the latest kernel, but also don't have to live with bugs and security issues that don't get fixed, out of fear that updating will fix some issues but might introduce others. It's the best of both worlds - you can update to the same kernel you had, plus fixes only.

Post Reply

Return to “Kernels”