One single 'set' approach for future browser Extension?

Issues and / or general discussion relating to Puppy

Moderator: Forum moderators

Post Reply
Clarity
Posts: 3823
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:59 pm
Has thanked: 1621 times
Been thanked: 521 times

One single 'set' approach for future browser Extension?

Post by Clarity »

Mozilla, Apple, Microsoft, and Google browsers to cooperate.

As this initiative progresses, there will be little to concern. The only differences will be which UI browser we prefer.

One way of looking at this approach they announce.

User avatar
xenial
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 7:41 am
Location: Lincolnshire.UK.
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: One single 'set' approach for future browser Extension?

Post by xenial »

In an ideal world web standards should use non obfusucated javascript code and create a common standard which ALL browsers can render sites properly instead of google forcing their own standards and making chromium the de facto standard browser.

Clarity
Posts: 3823
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:59 pm
Has thanked: 1621 times
Been thanked: 521 times

Re: One single 'set' approach for future browser Extension?

Post by Clarity »

I am not sure if it is Google forcing a standard. They just created an efficient engine and open-source it years ago. The companies using it, over the years, found efficiency in the engine and are moving to coaleste around its use while making it easy for extension developers to build once and run anywhere the engine exist.

Its not google ... more so the BILLIONS of lines of code we live in and manufacturers looking for better ways for app/extension developers to also contribute.

I think.

User avatar
mikewalsh
Moderator
Posts: 6154
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:40 pm
Location: King's Lynn, UK
Has thanked: 792 times
Been thanked: 1979 times

Re: One single 'set' approach for future browser Extension?

Post by mikewalsh »

Let me put this another way.

xenial wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 9:21 pm

In an ideal world web standards should use non obfusucated javascript code and create a common standard which ALL browsers can render sites properly instead of google forcing their own standards and making chromium the de facto standard browser.

IF Chrome wasn't so widely-used - and why use it, if you don't like it, hmm? - then Chrome/the Chromium Projects/the Electron framework & all related apps built around it, etc., etc., would years ago have been relegated to that huge pile of applications that Google have abandoned over time.

Such hasn't happened, and Chrome dominates the browser market. 'Nuff said, I think.

It's the billions of users that maintain Google's position of power as an internet supergiant. No-one else.

Mike. ;)

User avatar
xenial
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 7:41 am
Location: Lincolnshire.UK.
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: One single 'set' approach for future browser Extension?

Post by xenial »

mikewalsh wrote: Wed Mar 09, 2022 2:47 pm

Let me put this another way.

xenial wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 9:21 pm

In an ideal world web standards should use non obfusucated javascript code and create a common standard which ALL browsers can render sites properly instead of google forcing their own standards and making chromium the de facto standard browser.

IF Chrome wasn't so widely-used - and why use it, if you don't like it, hmm? - then Chrome/the Chromium Projects/the Electron framework & all related apps built around it, etc., etc., would years ago have been relegated to that huge pile of applications that Google have abandoned over time.

Such hasn't happened, and Chrome dominates the browser market. 'Nuff said, I think.

It's the billions of users that maintain Google's position of power as an internet supergiant. No-one else.

Mike. ;)

Hmm with the greatest respect dearest mike but higher numbers should not dictate standards.

Ford cars have a massive number but not all of us like fords and prefer volvos for example.
Money talks and google have it in abundance and so have a huge influence. ;)

Post Reply

Return to “Users”