When you want to update the browser, download the new tarball from the official site, re-pack it as an sfs-addon and use it in the place of your previous sfs-addon. That's what I do. However I don't download every new version, not necessary although I know some users always want the newest available (which is not necessarily always a good thing). I use stuff until I encounter problems with it otherwise I don't bother to upgrade.
Darkside of the Pale Moon
Moderator: Forum moderators
- DeeMal
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2022 9:57 pm
- Location: Memphis, TN
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Darkside of the Pale Moon
While I agree that the newest versions are not always the best even if they address security concerns, I will always download them even if they cause issues in the short term. Of course, if I know beforehand that that particular download could call issues, I will wait before I do.
- JASpup
- Posts: 1653
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 10:52 am
- Location: U.S.A.
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: Darkside of the Pale Moon
noted
even more incentive to use other browsers
On the Whiz-Neophyte Bridge
Linux Über Alles
Disclaimer: You may not be reading my words as posted.
- JASpup
- Posts: 1653
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 10:52 am
- Location: U.S.A.
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: Darkside of the Pale Moon
I'll be honest, I use most of them, but not equally. On 64 I'm usually in Pale Moon or crypto-freak Brave. 32 it's same or Chromium.
Motivated you got Pale Moon and whatever your 2nd choice is. The info is here.
On the Whiz-Neophyte Bridge
Linux Über Alles
Disclaimer: You may not be reading my words as posted.
-
- Posts: 2878
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:37 am
- Has thanked: 2200 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Darkside of the Pale Moon
I use LibreWolf appimage from https://gitlab.com/librewolf-community/ ... -/releases about 95% of the time.
It's privacy hardened, doesn't run as spot, easy to update, just download, unzip and click on it. Will use the profile from the previous version in /root/.config, but will warn you if you try to fire up the previous version appimage. It doesn't like that.
Also, it's usually a version or two behind official Firefox, so it's probably less buggy than the very latest update.
But it's 64bit, if that's a consideration.
Of course I'm using Fossapup64, and maybe appimages don't automatically boot in other versions of puppy.
geo_c
Old School Hipster, and Such