Chromium 96.sfs didn't replace v94 in remastered Fossapup (Solved)

Issues and / or general discussion relating to Puppy

Moderator: Forum moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
wizard
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2020 7:50 pm
Has thanked: 2635 times
Been thanked: 685 times

Chromium 96.sfs didn't replace v94 in remastered Fossapup (Solved)

Post by wizard »

I have a Puppy fossapup64 9.5 remaster that included peebees Chromium 94.sfs in the remaster. I tried installing Chromium 96.sfs thinking the layered file system would then use v96. However, when I restarted Chromuim it still showed v94. Have I misunderstood how the file system works?

Thanks
wizard

Last edited by Flash on Sat Jan 01, 2022 4:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

Big pile of OLD computers

User avatar
rockedge
Site Admin
Posts: 6538
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:38 am
Location: Connecticut,U.S.A.
Has thanked: 2745 times
Been thanked: 2619 times
Contact:

Re: Browsers in layered file system

Post by rockedge »

Does the v96 SFS load to a path location that has precedence over where the v94 is stored?
Is a chrome launcher being used that points to the v94's binary file? Or is a symlink involved in the start that is pointing to v94?

Does the v96 SFS load into the same location as v94?

Also clear the browser cache(s)

User avatar
wizard
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2020 7:50 pm
Has thanked: 2635 times
Been thanked: 685 times

Re: Browsers in layered file system

Post by wizard »

Does the v96 SFS load to a path location that has precedence over where the v94 is stored?

That's what I don't know. Since the v94 was installed and then remastered it is part of puppy_fossapup64_9.5.sfs. When v96.sfs is installed it isn't in the save file/folder so I don't know what layer it is.

Is a chrome launcher being used that points to the v94's binary file?

It uses a launcher and I have looked at it in both versions and they are identical.

Does the v96 SFS load into the same location as v94?

Pretty sure they're in the same locations, but different layers

Clearing the cache had no effect.

Happy New Year Rock

Thanks for ideas, helped me eliminate things
wizard

Big pile of OLD computers

User avatar
6502coder
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:21 pm
Location: Western US
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Browsers in layered file system

Post by 6502coder »

@wizard

Aren't SFSs "under" the main Puppy sfs? (Whereas PET-installed apps are "over".)

https://bkhome.org/archive/puppylinux/d ... works.html

See "Architectural Overview" diagram.

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 1636
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 714 times
Contact:

Re: Chromium 96.sfs didn't replace v94 in remastered Fossapup

Post by peebee »

Rename 96 to be a ydrv to make it "overwrite" the 94 in the remastered main sfs........

Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels

User avatar
wizard
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2020 7:50 pm
Has thanked: 2635 times
Been thanked: 685 times

Re: Chromium 96.sfs didn't replace v94 in remastered Fossapup

Post by wizard »

@6502coder

Thanks, that's something I was looking for.

@peebee

Thanks, that works and is easy. I'm working on Cloudpup and want to have a easy way for users to update the browser.

Happy New Year

wizard

Big pile of OLD computers

Post Reply

Return to “Users”