Does Xenialpup's size on disk affect speed?

Issues and / or general discussion relating to Puppy

Moderator: Forum moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
pp4mnklinux
Posts: 919
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2020 5:43 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Has thanked: 568 times
Been thanked: 245 times
Contact:

Does Xenialpup's size on disk affect speed?

Post by pp4mnklinux »

Hello everybody:

I want to ask u a question.

I'm using xenial pup 7.5 with a lot of installed software.

When using windows, it was important the size / space of the disk u use with your installed programs (the bigger space used, the slower it goes). Does it happens with puppy? That is, nowadays my puppy size is 20Gb. Does it work better with the original ISO size?

It's recomended use a smaller size OR its the same because puppy works on ram?

thanky.

Clarity
Posts: 3458
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:59 pm
Has thanked: 1423 times
Been thanked: 459 times

Re: Puppy Size

Post by Clarity »

This is not a simple question to answer. Size as you refer is NOT the only criterion.

The simplest I can offer is performance "may" be what you want or are after; at least considering your outlining your configuration.

Thoughts

User avatar
mikewalsh
Moderator
Posts: 5752
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:40 pm
Location: King's Lynn, UK
Has thanked: 640 times
Been thanked: 1782 times

Re: Puppy Size

Post by mikewalsh »

@pp4mnklinux :-

I have to assume that 20 GB is the total size of your 'save'?

That being the case, question:- Do you have sufficient RAM to load Puppy, save-file/folder and all in its entirety?

If the answer is 'Yes', I don't see it would make much difference to the speed Puppy would run at. The frugal/unionaufs 'approach' doesn't work even remotely like a traditional, full install.....where absolutely everything is continuously being read from/written back to the hard drive, all the time.

If, however, the answer is 'No', then I confess I'm not entirely certain what the Puppy approach is.....and how Puppy deals with this. Others can probably answer this better than I.

Mike. ;)

Puppy "stuff" ~ MORE Puppy "stuff" ~ ....and MORE! :D
_______________________________________________________

Image

User avatar
bigpup
Moderator
Posts: 6543
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 11:19 pm
Location: Earth, South Eastern U.S.
Has thanked: 796 times
Been thanked: 1361 times

Re: Does Xenialpup's size on disk affect speed?

Post by bigpup »

I am not going to give you an answer until you tell us what kind of install Xenialpup is.
Full, frugal, live?
Installed on a CD/DVD, USB flash drive, Internal hard drive, what.....?

About using a pupsave:
As a frugal install using a save file or folder.
The save file or folder is not loaded into ram.
The save is loaded read/write. It only becomes part of the file system.
Programs that have been added to a frugal install are located in the save.
When you start the program, it is read from the save and loaded into ram, to run.

Forum Global Moderator
The things you do not tell us, are usually the clue to fixing the problem.
When I was a kid, I wanted to be older.
This is not what I expected :o

User avatar
Grey
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:33 am
Location: Russia
Has thanked: 75 times
Been thanked: 366 times

Re: Does Xenialpup's size on disk affect speed?

Post by Grey »

Xenialpup only accesses the disk when needed. You can understand this even by observation: after starting the system, the first launch of a large program (for example Gimp) takes some time, but the next launches of the same program will run faster. All Phil's systems work on the same principle. Here's my save folder in Fossapup, it's the same there:

disk_usage.png
disk_usage.png (18.39 KiB) Viewed 133 times

Fossapup OS, Ryzen 5 3600 CPU, 64 GB RAM, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4 GB, Sound Blaster Audigy Rx with amplifier + Yamaha speakers for loud sound, USB Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1 Pro V3 + headphones for quiet sound.

User avatar
amethyst
Posts: 2361
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:35 am
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 479 times

Re: Does Xenialpup's size on disk affect speed?

Post by amethyst »

A different approach followed by many old timers is not to install stuff but load your applications as sfs-addon files (or additional drives) instead as needed. I have been using the latter method. I haven't been using a savefile for years and only save small configuration changes to an adrv. However, there's nothing wrong with using a savefile but my recommendation would be to keep it very small. Big savefiles make me dizzy. BTW - you can get rid of that big savefile by saving the contents as an additional drive, like a ydrv and then start using a small savefile....

Post Reply

Return to “Users”