New PC's address Artificial Intelligence advancements

[Clarity]

Microsoft's AI-PC

ALL Major Manufacturer's are producing AI-PCs, too.

Then this NEW screen laptop announces. Will it come to desktops, too?

[dogcat]

Microsoft's AI-PC

ALL Major Manufacturer's are producing AI-PCs, too.

Then this NEW screen laptop announces. Will it come to desktops, too?

No such thing as actual "artificial intelligence".

"Artificial intelligence" is a misnamed search algorithym with advanced sorting that they stuck a front-end on to allow quiries in human understandable terms.

It being a search algorithym, it needs to search for information from somewhere. Those pushing this search mechanism wish to implement it in such a way as to create information that can be monetized.

They install the program on its own dedicated operating system, load that on a chip and stick it in the computer for interaction, same as a BIOS chip.

The program will not only interact with the operating system but will also search through all data available to the computer, not just on the computer but all peripherals connected to the computer including bluetooth enabled devices. A whole house spy network that can also interact with any device with a bluetooth signal. That includes the new android and apple phones that now have "always on" BLE bluetooth even when the phones are turned off.

It is nothing more than a whole house spy system disquised as a computer utility.

[Clarity]

Yes @dogcat

This phenom has been at play for over 30 years now. Nothing new, per se. And, it will continue into our future without relent. Here's an example of what you share: Automakers...

I am not suggesting agreement with the behavior, but, the obvious is "ever-present".

And with the benefits of "always on" BLE bluetooth, which has been an Apple feature for awhile, that ability you present continues to be ubiquitous along with the many others.

[geo_c]

And with the benefits of "always on" BLE bluetooth, which has been an Apple feature for awhile, that ability you present continues to be ubiquitous along with the many others.

It's a simple matter, the benefits do not outweigh the cost to you children and grandchildren. By embracing it because it's forced on you I would liken to Stockholm Syndrome.

"But you will be left behind and greatly inconvenienced if you don't play along..."

Yes. There are a few times when not having a gps map app has inconvenienced me, but I am perceptually free and take responsibility for finding my way around the real world. That's a benefit which is difficult to communicate to my millenial collegues who literally use google maps to find their way out of a 5000 sq foot building. TRUE STORY.

[Clarity]

Again, 'I am not suggesting agreement with the behavior, but, the obvious is "ever-present".'

Something I learned when a small boy. It stuck with me. In all my years in technology.

My grandfather was born the year after my grandmother, 1899. When a small boy, he bragged about how often he had to use his mule to pull autos out of the ditches often; so he was opposed to having a car. He died in the late 70s never owning one or driving one even when it was available to him.

This recount really means nothing, but is just my personal experience.

I note that nothing really changes in our human behavior, while it is reasonably important to understand it.

[geo_c]

He died in the late 70s never owning one or driving one even when it was available to him.
I note that nothing really changes in our human behavior, while it is reasonably important to understand it.

He was right, and people who drive cars are also right. It's simply a trade off. Freedom is the ability to choose the option that offers you personally the best side of the trade. Those who make laws that say all cars must include kill switches and driver biometric montioring are not on the side of freedom, no matter what their motives are.

Those who are pushing to make all electronic devices and computer chips into personal data monitors are not on the side of freedom. And whoever goes along with that or encourages it is in essence aiding the enslavement of other human beings, no matter what their motives are. Not being provocative, just not mincing words.

The only reason I bring it up is that when you announce that something is here and you must deal with, or better yet embrace it to embark on real engagement with the future, I would say no, it's here, and it has huge negative consequences. There is a choice, and those of us who know it's here and 'inevitable' but choose not to engage with it, tend to balk at the insistance that it's the 'future.'

It may well be the future, a 'benefit to mankind' which has to be dictated through law and forced through monopoly at the expense of freedom.

Whose doing the body count on these 'benefits.' and comparing how many lives are saved and improved versus how many are snuffed out and degraded by these technological advancements?

[Clarity]

... It may well be the future, a 'benefit to mankind' which has to be dictated through law and forced through monopoly at the expense of freedom. ...

This is NOT how things work for mankind. Technology leads, evaluations follow, rules are requested, commissions study and propose regulations, then political steps (laws) are put in place to standardize a consistent operation and behavior within.

I sense you have an objection to the current technology. I do not have an objection as in my lifetime I have witness all of the many changes that have come (and gone, too) that exist in time and its history. My background in schools and technology has been in development, implementations, research, operational planning and implementations in many new environments for locations and customers and within corp to these technologies and their uses.

AI and the changes we see are similar to a host of technology changes and advances from how things were done in the past. It is normal as mankind has done this for centuries and for centuries into the future (unless we destroy ourselves collectively) this will continue.

You or I do not have controls, but we can appeal to the controllers for taking approaches that benefit the people who will be gaining the many things from medicine to travel that is going to continue.

I again restate the 'prime' statement I repeated earlier.

This is not in opposition to what you share; just a corollary.

[williwaw]

This is NOT how things work for mankind.

say what?

Technology leads, evaluations follow, rules are requested, commissions study and propose regulations, then political steps (laws) are put in place to standardize a consistent operation and behavior within.

Sounds like the deliberate dithering of a ministry policy committee in TelAviv discussing the implementation of AI guided targeting for IDF bombers

Whose doing the body count on these 'benefits'?

AI of course!
as always,
garbage in, garbage out