More progress for ARM chips

[BologneChe]

https://www.pcworld.com/article/2284554 ... t-too.html

[mikewalsh]

@BologneChe :-

This was mentioned quite a number of times on the old forum, and in the past on here. PLEASE don't post JUST a link; TBH, it's just being 'lazy'.

A little bit of description never hurts; you only need add a line or so. Some members will refuse to read a "link-only" post on principle, anyway.....

Just thought I'd mention it! Cheers.

Mike.

[BologneChe]

@BologneChe :-

This was mentioned quite a number of times on the old forum, and in the past on here. PLEASE don't post JUST a link; TBH, it's just being 'lazy'.

A little bit of description never hurts; you only need add a line or so. Some members will refuse to read a "link-only" post on principle, anyway.....

Just thought I'd mention it! Cheers.

Mike.

I take your comment into consideration.
Bonne journée à vous @mikewalsh

[mikewalsh]

@BologneChe :-

Nah, no worries. It's a trap I see so many fall into, and it's frowned upon by most forum moderation teams. Some are bigger offenders than others; fortunately, you're not one of them.

Incidentally, following up on the link, that's food for thought; if Qualcomm's new top-end chips ARE running at those kind of clock speeds AND giving Intel's new flagship CPUs a good trouncing, then all I can say is......"Watch your ass, Intel..!"

Doubtless Pat Gelsinger has already got something 'up his sleeve' to counter Qualcomm's claims. A case of "Watch this space", methinks..... We shall see.

Mike.

[BologneChe]

I use a computer with an M1 Max chip and I don't plan to return to Intel anytime soon. I still have two other Intel computers to complete my setup. M1 chips are fast and versatile.

[dogcat]

@BologneChe :-

This was mentioned quite a number of times on the old forum, and in the past on here. PLEASE don't post JUST a link; TBH, it's just being 'lazy'.

A little bit of description never hurts; you only need add a line or so. Some members will refuse to read a "link-only" post on principle, anyway.....

Just thought I'd mention it! Cheers.

Mike.

He put the description in the post title.
I see no problem with it.

edit: I will explain that a little more.
A first post in a topic gets to choose the subject and that can contain a complete description of a link.
That works fine in this post.