More progress for ARM chips
- BologneChe
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 12:29 am
- Location: Stoneham, Québec
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
- mikewalsh
- Moderator
- Posts: 6038
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:40 pm
- Location: King's Lynn, UK
- Has thanked: 738 times
- Been thanked: 1904 times
Re: More progress for ARM chips
@BologneChe :-
This was mentioned quite a number of times on the old forum, and in the past on here. PLEASE don't post JUST a link; TBH, it's just being 'lazy'.
A little bit of description never hurts; you only need add a line or so. Some members will refuse to read a "link-only" post on principle, anyway.....
Just thought I'd mention it! Cheers.
Mike.
- BologneChe
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 12:29 am
- Location: Stoneham, Québec
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
Re: More progress for ARM chips
mikewalsh wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:24 am@BologneChe :-
This was mentioned quite a number of times on the old forum, and in the past on here. PLEASE don't post JUST a link; TBH, it's just being 'lazy'.
A little bit of description never hurts; you only need add a line or so. Some members will refuse to read a "link-only" post on principle, anyway.....
Just thought I'd mention it! Cheers.
Mike.
I take your comment into consideration.
Bonne journée à vous @mikewalsh
Born to lose; live to win
- mikewalsh
- Moderator
- Posts: 6038
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:40 pm
- Location: King's Lynn, UK
- Has thanked: 738 times
- Been thanked: 1904 times
Re: More progress for ARM chips
@BologneChe :-
Nah, no worries. It's a trap I see so many fall into, and it's frowned upon by most forum moderation teams. Some are bigger offenders than others; fortunately, you're not one of them.
Incidentally, following up on the link, that's food for thought; if Qualcomm's new top-end chips ARE running at those kind of clock speeds AND giving Intel's new flagship CPUs a good trouncing, then all I can say is......"Watch your ass, Intel..!"
Doubtless Pat Gelsinger has already got something 'up his sleeve' to counter Qualcomm's claims. A case of "Watch this space", methinks..... We shall see.
Mike.
- BologneChe
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 12:29 am
- Location: Stoneham, Québec
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
Re: More progress for ARM chips
I use a computer with an M1 Max chip and I don't plan to return to Intel anytime soon. I still have two other Intel computers to complete my setup. M1 chips are fast and versatile.
Born to lose; live to win
Re: More progress for ARM chips
mikewalsh wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:24 am@BologneChe :-
This was mentioned quite a number of times on the old forum, and in the past on here. PLEASE don't post JUST a link; TBH, it's just being 'lazy'.
A little bit of description never hurts; you only need add a line or so. Some members will refuse to read a "link-only" post on principle, anyway.....
Just thought I'd mention it! Cheers.
Mike.
He put the description in the post title.
I see no problem with it.
edit: I will explain that a little more.
A first post in a topic gets to choose the subject and that can contain a complete description of a link.
That works fine in this post.
Μακάριοι οι καθαροί στην καρδιά * επειδή, θα δουν τον Θεό.