I am booting BookwormPup64 10.0.4 which should be close to using the very latest changes in how Puppy works.
I changed the boot menu and added pfix=nocopy so the BookwormPup64 SFS files do not load into RAM.
When it boots it says they are loading into the file system, but not into RAM.
So it seems the nocopy command is working.
However, after booting to a working desktop.
When I check on how much RAM is being used.
It is reporting the same amount used, as when it boots and does load the SFS files into RAM.
Like anything.
Can someone else try this and see what they get?
Please try it in BookwormPup64 10.0.4
Older Puppy versions may not show this affect.