FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build

Moderator: Forum moderators

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 1457
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: FocalPup32 FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jun-2021

Post by peebee »

Now
835e82192476134efeb5b4c2332d6e38 UPupFF+D-20.12+7.iso
see post #1

Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels

User avatar
gychang
Posts: 550
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2020 4:51 pm
Location: San Diego, CA
Has thanked: 191 times
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: light browser issue

Post by gychang »

nice build for my 32bit laptop. I have bionicpup32 installed and light browser works well in youtube in the same laptop. However light browser shipped with this build (FPFF) does not work with youtube, even after installing some dependencies as specified. Is there a way to install and use light that was shipped with BP32 in this build? I need to use this build rather than BP32 since bspwm (which I use) in BP32 is not working as expected. :?:

======

Puppy Bytes, utube videos
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg-DUU ... u62_iqR-MA

======

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 1457
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: light browser issue

Post by peebee »

gychang wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:09 pm

Is there a way to install and use light that was shipped with BP32 in this build?

Hi @gychang
The version of Light is exactly the same in both builds so it must be a problem caused by a more up-to-date library in FocalPup32.....

Run Light in a terminal and see if there are any clues from dmesg after the "failure"??

Light is getting rather old - maybe try Palemoon or SeaMonkey??

Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels

User avatar
gychang
Posts: 550
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2020 4:51 pm
Location: San Diego, CA
Has thanked: 191 times
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: FocalPup32 FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jun-2021

Post by gychang »

when starting light browser I get the following... I am now using Palemoon to view youtube but I feel the light browser in the BP32 seem little faster and smoother???

Code: Select all

root:# light
1625067968669	addons.repository	WARN	Search failed when repopulating cache
Crash Annotation GraphicsCriticalError: |[0][GFX1-]: Unrecognized feature WEBRENDER (t=165.005) [GFX1-]: Unrecognized feature WEBRENDER
1625068000007	addons.update-checker	WARN	onUpdateCheckComplete failed to parse update manifest: [Exception... "Update manifest is missing a required addons property."  nsresult: "0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE)"  location: "JS frame :: resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm :: getRequiredProperty :: line 471"  data: no] Stack trace: getRequiredProperty()@resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm:471 < parseJSONManifest()@resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm:481 < UpdateParser.prototype.onLoad/parser()@resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm:652 < UpdateParser.prototype.onLoad()@resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm:672 < UpdateParser/<()@resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm:590
1625068008984	addons.update-checker	WARN	onUpdateCheckComplete failed to parse update manifest: [Exception... "Update manifest is missing a required addons property."  nsresult: "0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE)"  location: "JS frame :: resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm :: getRequiredProperty :: line 471"  data: no] Stack trace: getRequiredProperty()@resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm:471 < parseJSONManifest()@resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm:481 < UpdateParser.prototype.onLoad/parser()@resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm:652 < UpdateParser.prototype.onLoad()@resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm:672 < UpdateParser/<()@resource://gre/modules/addons/AddonUpdateChecker.jsm:590
console.error: 
  Message: Error: Error(s) encountered during statement execution: too many SQL variables
  Stack:
    ConnectionData.prototype<._executeStatement/pending<.handleCompletion@resource://gre/modules/Sqlite.jsm:807:25

console.error: 
  Message: Error: Error(s) encountered during statement execution: too many SQL variables
  Stack:
    ConnectionData.prototype<._executeStatement/pending<.handleCompletion@resource://gre/modules/Sqlite.jsm:807:25


(light:10476): Gtk-CRITICAL **: 08:52:11.935: IA__gtk_widget_set_colormap: assertion 'GDK_IS_COLORMAP (colormap)' failed

======

Puppy Bytes, utube videos
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg-DUU ... u62_iqR-MA

======

HerrBert
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:14 pm
Location: Germany, NRW
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jun-2021

Post by HerrBert »

I'm now running the latest version UPupFF+D_20.12+7 and it's devx_upupff+d_20.12+7.sfs

Forum member @Kjellinux points to a problem with devx: viewtopic.php?p=31928#p31928

Today i did a quick test, trying to compile sylpheed-3.7.0, but it fails:

Code: Select all

# ./configure --prefix=/usr
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
checking whether make supports nested variables... (cached) yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for gcc... no
checking for cc... no
checking for cl.exe... no
configure: error: in `/root/sylpheed-3.7.0':
configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH
See `config.log' for more details
# 
Attachments
Screenshot.jpg
Screenshot.jpg (125.22 KiB) Viewed 2188 times
User avatar
peebee
Posts: 1457
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jun-2021

Post by peebee »

@HerrBert
Thank you for raising - it's a Woof-CE problem - issue raised:
https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/w ... ssues/2402

Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels

HerrBert
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:14 pm
Location: Germany, NRW
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jun-2021

Post by HerrBert »

Temporarily fixed it locally:

Code: Select all

cd /usr/bin
for N in i686-linux-gnu-*;do X=${N/#i686-linux-gnu-}; ln -s $N ${X/%-10};done 

drops some errors about existing symlinks...

Compiling sylpheed still fails. Tried several times with some symlinking header files but at least had to give up due to a missing header file glibconfig.h.

EDIT:

After having lunch and going for a walk i tried to compile sylpheed again. After some reading and several more attempts : success. What i missed was passing CFLAG to ./configure
I don't recall i ever had to pass a flag when compiling. There's always a first time...

When trying to retrieve CFLAG there were some missing files for pkg-config:

  • freetype2

  • libselinux

  • libpcre2-8

I found the dev-packages via ppm and installed them:

  • libfreetype-dev_2.10.1-2ubuntu0.1_i386.deb

  • libpcre2-dev_10.34-7_i386.deb

  • libselinux1-dev_3.0-1build2_i386.deb

Finally

Code: Select all

./configure --prefix=/usr CFLAGS="$(pkg-config --cflags --libs glib-2.0 gtk+-2.0)"
make
make install
mkdir sylpheed-3.7.0-focal
make DESTDIR=`pwd`/sylpheed-3.7.0-focal install

(second install for creating a .pet)

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 1457
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jul-2021

Post by peebee »

Now
55c0746bbc7c2f2c7a27147646f4364d UPupFF+D-20.12+8.iso
see post #1

devx also fixed and updated

Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels

HerrBert
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:14 pm
Location: Germany, NRW
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jul-2021

Post by HerrBert »

When trying to retrieve CFLAG there were some missing files for pkg-config:

freetype2

libselinux

libpcre2-8

not fixed in devx_upupff+d_20.12+8.sfs

Another issue i have noticed is mp console editor's menus do not work.

sindi
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 3:34 pm

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jul-2021

Post by sindi »

2005 DELL B130 with 1GB RAM PC2-4200, 1.5GB swap file, 1.4GHz cpu, Intel video. Fossa64 claims to need dual core and 2GB RAM.
Nothing older than BionicPup has worked right on here - bad video, no sound, no ethernet, frozen mouse, freezes, etc.

So far it all works - video, sound, eth0 and wlan0 (b44 and b43 - which do NOT work in the latest BionicPup32).
238MB RAM used (plus buffer) while running palemoon at the forum site.

Print management appears to work (it does not in an older BionicPup32).

The menu worked to download palemoon.sfs, X reloaded itself, and Palemoon 29.3.1 is working (from Stephen Pusser, I presume).

I am very pleased!

One small change since BionicPup32 is I cannot access a vt. Ctrl-Alt-F2. I use several vts or splitvt with lynx, pico or nano, ssh, etc.

The youtube-viewer 3.7.6 pet which I just installed cannot find if.pm. How/where do I get it? Is there a better pet?

Youtube works in Palemoon (slowly, with ads, watchable at 360p most of the time).

Focal32 is not listed as an official puppy and took a while to find.

User avatar
amethyst
Posts: 2355
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:35 am
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 473 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jul-2021

Post by amethyst »

Youtube works in Palemoon (slowly, with ads, watchable at 360p most of the time).

Watch youtube"embedded" ie. directly from another search site like Duckduckgo or Bing. No ads and you avoid the resource hungry youtube pages.

User avatar
666philb
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 3:18 pm
Location: wales uk
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 146 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jul-2021

Post by 666philb »

sindi wrote: Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:48 am

One small change since BionicPup32 is I cannot access a vt. Ctrl-Alt-F2. I use several vts or splitvt with lynx, pico or nano, ssh, etc.

hi sindi ,

edit /etc/X11/xorg.conf

Code: Select all

Option "DontVTSwitch" "false"
sindi
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 3:34 pm

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jul-2021

Post by sindi »

To use vt:

edit /etc/X11/xorg.conf

Code: Select all

Option "DontVTSwitch" "false"

I commented out the line with "true" instead. It worked. This is the ONLY puppy I have ever used (starting with 1) with this odd default.

Also I need to use two fingers for vertical scroll, not one. I think I fixed that in mouse setup.

sindi
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 3:34 pm

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 24-Jul-2021

Post by sindi »

"I need to use two fingers for vertical scroll, not one. I think I fixed that in mouse setup."
I checked off (in mouse setup, touchpad) 'scroll zone vertical'. Only two-finger scroll was checked, unlike in bionic32.

keniv
Posts: 624
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:18 pm
Location: Scotland
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by keniv »

I've made a manual frugal install of UPupFF+D-20.12 which I am booting with Grub4Dos. I have not included the arvd but instead installed two portable 32 bit browsers. One is Palemoon 29.4.1 which is also the default browser (I'm posting from it now) and the other is Firefox91.2.0 esr. This allows me to have two fairly up to date browsers on a 32bit OS. I also run Dpup Stretch and use the same browsers. I have also installed the latest version of YouTube-Get. All of this has worked, however I have also attempted to install pwidgets. I have tried pwidgets-2.5.8-486 and 2.6.0-486 .pets Neither of these work but worse still they cause the screen to freeze which in turn requires a hard shutdown. I have the 2.5.8-486 version running in Dpup Stretch without any problems. Can I ask if anybody else is running pwidgets on this pup and if so which version or can anybody suggest how I can get the versions I've mentioned above to work.

Regards,

Ken.

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 1457
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by peebee »

Hi @keniv

pWidgets has a very aggressive and inflexible pinstall .............. which is incompatible with the FocalPup32 lib directory structure and it therefore overwrites system files!!!

By stripping out the unneeded parts this version seems to work ......

pwidgets-2.6.0-486-uff.pet
(156.11 KiB) Downloaded 73 times

.

Screenshot.png
Screenshot.png (328.54 KiB) Viewed 1687 times

Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels

keniv
Posts: 624
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:18 pm
Location: Scotland
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by keniv »

@peebee

By stripping out the unneeded parts this version seems to work ......

pwidgets-2.6.0-486-uff.pet

Hi peebee,
Thanks for this. I installed the .pet then I made some changes choosing the widgets that I normally use and they all work.

Thanks again,

Ken.

gilles
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by gilles »

Hello,
This Focal Fossa 32 bits iso is perfect. It works perfectly, both with my 64 bits computer and with the very small Asus Eee 701SD netbook that I use when I travel very far away (nobody will want to steal it!). Even Youtube works perfectly with Firefox in the Eee 701SD. I just have to set the youtube resolution to minimum.

However, with the Asus Eee 701SD, I would like to install a panning with xrandr, because some (only some) set up windows are a problem.
In principle, it is enough to write a script :

#!/bin/sh
xrandr --output LVDS1 --mode 800x480 --panning 800x600

600 is only an example to test

This is what I have done : https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21A ... ot&o=OneUp
and made it executable.
But, it doesn't work with Focal Fossa 32 bits.

Writing xrandr in the terminal I have this :
# xrandr
xrandr: Output LVDS1 is not disconnected but has no modes
Screen 0: minimum 8 x 8, current 800 x 480, maximum 32767 x 32767
LVDS1 connected primary 800x480+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 152mm x 91mm
TV1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
VIRTUAL1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
800x480 (0x47) 32.000MHz -HSync -VSync
h: width 800 start 840 end 968 total 1056 skew 0 clock 30.30KHz
v: height 480 start 481 end 484 total 505 clock 60.01Hz

Any idea ?
Thank you

gilles
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by gilles »

Nobody know how I could set up a panning with xrandr in UPupFF ?

williams2
Posts: 1023
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2020 5:45 pm
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by williams2 »

I think the video drivers do not support your hardware.
It may be using the vesa driver.

Older versions of Puppy (and Linux) support older hardware better.

Newer versions of Puppy support newer hardware better.

Does this show what driver is being used:

lspci -nnk | grep -iA3 VGA

User avatar
JASpup
Posts: 1653
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 10:52 am
Location: U.S.A.
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 89 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by JASpup »

gilles wrote: Sat Nov 06, 2021 2:15 pm

This Focal Fossa 32 bits iso is perfect. It works perfectly, both with my 64 bits computer and with the very small Asus Eee 701SD netbook that I use when I travel very far away (nobody will want to steal it!).

@gilles are you using a 32-bit distribution on a 64-bit system for the convenience of one setup?

On the Whiz-Neophyte Bridge
Linux Über Alles
Disclaimer: You may not be reading my words as posted.

gilles
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by gilles »

Hi,

William2
lspci -nnk | grep -iA3 VGA :
Image
Image
Image

Thank you for your help

JASpup
Because I can use the same frugal install with my 2 computers. I use a 64 bits computer at home and a 32 bits computer (Asus EEE PC 701SD with 2 Go RAM) when I am traveling far away. It works perfectly (even with Youtube, see there : viewtopic.php?t=4393), because nobody will want to steal it. It depends where I am, but it is not always possible to put a computer in a safe place. With this old EEE PC the risk is very limited, even in poor countries.
In poor countries, most people cannot afford to buy a computer (and it is the very large majority of the world population !) but they can get, for nothing, or nearly nothing, old 32 bits computers people doesn't want any more in ours countries. So, it is very clear that old 32 bits computers will go on to be used for a long time, as long as puppy linux, or others, will provide 32 bits iso !
I am looking if I can change my usual frugal install to a more up to date puppy linux.

Attachments
Screenshot2.png
Screenshot2.png (97.27 KiB) Viewed 1756 times
Screenshot2.png
Screenshot2.png (97.27 KiB) Viewed 1756 times
Screenshot.png
Screenshot.png (97.95 KiB) Viewed 1756 times
User avatar
JASpup
Posts: 1653
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 10:52 am
Location: U.S.A.
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 89 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by JASpup »

Hello @gilles,

I cannot tell where you are. French colony?

Your Focal looks good. I would consider using a peebea +D pup 64-bit for the XFCE ydrv. Newer Debian works differently and would still be an adjustment, but as a main distro it would be worth it when X-Tahr and Xenial are too old.

What, if anything, are we sacrificing without 64 os?

I know what you mean about the value of machines. If I removed my internal HD, I would feel the same way.

On the Whiz-Neophyte Bridge
Linux Über Alles
Disclaimer: You may not be reading my words as posted.

gilles
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by gilles »

JASpup wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 4:41 pm

Hello @gilles,

Your Focal looks good. I would consider using a peebea +D pup 64-bit for the XFCE ydrv. Newer Debian works differently and would still be an adjustment, but as a main distro it would be worth it when X-Tahr and Xenial are too old.

Hello JASpup,
Yes, I am french, but I use to travel far away to foreign countries (before the covid 19). I speak french, english, and spanish (and a little german).

I, already told you why I am using, and shall go on, to use 32 bits iso : "Because I can use the same frugal install with my 2 computers. I use a 64 bits computer at home and a 32 bits computer (Asus EEE PC 701SD with 2 Go RAM) when I am traveling far away."
Old or not, Xenial 32 bits still works perfectly, even with my Eee PC, since I installed a 2 Go RAM ! It only needs an up to date browser (very easy to find !). The only (very little) problem is the availables packages in the PPM.
I do not understand why there is people always wanting the newest thing while an older one, already, gives you everything you need. Sure, I shall not change my spouse for this reason!

What, if anything, are we sacrificing without 64 os?

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean...
Friendly yours

User avatar
JASpup
Posts: 1653
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 10:52 am
Location: U.S.A.
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 89 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by JASpup »

@gilles salut,

Please forgive my understanding. I believe if you can use the exact same PUPSAVE on 64-bit and 32-bit machines, that is an advance. I had not thought of it!

I came to this thread to understand the Debian component. If, say, mounted partitions start using /media instead of /mnt, is that Debian?

Surely we would not trade in an older wife for more new compatibility problems. Sometimes the grass is greener on the older side.

In America, especially California, people are poor or affluent and no one seems to mind. It is not serious (liberte egalite fraternite says no one). Yet here most people have access to food and computers so I considered maybe you are in a colony too poor for newer computers.

The meaning of my question: if a 64-bit os is not necessary on a 64-bit computer, why do we need them? What is the advantage?

Regards

On the Whiz-Neophyte Bridge
Linux Über Alles
Disclaimer: You may not be reading my words as posted.

gilles
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by gilles »

Hello,

so I considered maybe you are in a colony too poor for newer computers.

You are wrong. But I always keep in mind that the majority of the world's population lives in poor countries. On the other hand, the preservation of our planet would imply not to throw away what works well, to buy a new product that brings nothing more than what we need, because its manufacture, and its transport, imply pollution that could be avoided and that the planet does not need.
Of course, this is not the concern of big companies who have every interest in pushing useless consumption.
Moreover, we should not forget that one of the fundamental goals of puppy linux is to give life back to old computers.

I must tell you that France doesn't have any more colonies. This is old history. People living in France have the same rights in every part of France (Europe, or overseas). and, of course, have the rigth to live in any part of France (Europe or Overseas). For the third time in only several years, next december (the 15th), people living in New Caledonia (Asia), will have to choose, to stay french or to become an independent country.

The meaning of my question: if a 64-bit os is not necessary on a 64-bit computer, why do we need them? What is the advantage?

This is a good question ! May be for something I do not need ! A 32 bits OS works as well on 64 or 32 bits computers, but a 64 bits OS works only on 64 bits computers

gilles
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by gilles »

back to the question :
Nobody knows how I could set up a panning with xrandr in this 32 bits UPupFF ?

User avatar
peebee
Posts: 1457
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2020 10:54 am
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by peebee »

You can move a window around by right-clicking and dragging on its thumbnail in the desktop pager in the systray...........

Is this sufficient for your needs?

Builder of LxPups, SPups, UPup32s, VoidPups; LXDE, LXQt, Xfce addons; Chromium, Firefox etc. sfs; & Kernels

gilles
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2020 11:07 pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by gilles »

Hi Peebee;

Thank you for your answer. As usual, you did a very good work.

But, sorry, it isn't always sufficient. Often I need to do a rigth clic, and then, when I clic "move" or "maximise" sometimes (not always), the desktop diseapears and I have the terminal, in whitch I must write "xwin" to get the desktop again.

So, it should be better (and much easier) to set up a panning... But, may be, it isn't posible with the 32 bits puppy linux Focal Fossa ?

Last edited by gilles on Sat Nov 13, 2021 8:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
JASpup
Posts: 1653
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2020 10:52 am
Location: U.S.A.
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 89 times

Re: FocalPup32 (UPupFF+D-20.12) FocalFossa+Debian Woof-CE build 08-Oct-2021

Post by JASpup »

I have noticed some video quirks, but eventually I can get a usable screen.

Williams2 suggested trying different distros. This may help. You might have luck with Mainline Xenial. Another possibility is an alternate desktop environment. They use different video utilities. I booted HirsuteHippo XFCE to show you (2nd monitor shows when present):

xfce-display.png
xfce-display.png (54.42 KiB) Viewed 1803 times

Hirsute is +D also one issue after Fossa. Fossa should have ydrv with the same utilities.

If your panning problem is ONLY on FocalPup32, it makes sense to post here. Otherwise I would suggest Users.

the preservation of our planet would imply not to throw away what works well, to buy a new product that brings nothing more than what we need, because its manufacture, and its transport, imply pollution that could be avoided and that the planet does not need.

I agree 100%.

By colony I meant former colony. Example: Quebec is in my consciousness as France. The rest is England. America is England. Mexico down to Tierra del Fuego is Spain, except Portugese Brasil.

Poor Spain is invading rich England in massive numbers, but I will save that for another time, like the military coup in Myanmar, or the idea that America has territories like Puerto Rico comprised of citizens who cannot vote.

A 32 bits OS works as well on 64 or 32 bits computers, but a 64 bits OS works only on 64 bits computers.

I would be interested in differences you notice in another thread.

On the Whiz-Neophyte Bridge
Linux Über Alles
Disclaimer: You may not be reading my words as posted.

Post Reply

Return to “Built from woof-CE Recipes”