Ouch, my howto's seems to have vanished. Does anyone have a backup of the old forum? I'm to st.up.id to keep backups of my own stuff
Search found 6 matches
- Sat Dec 05, 2020 3:41 am
- Forum: Users
- Topic: A link: To the Murga forum index page | WayBack machine | recent
- Replies: 13
- Views: 12022
- Sat Dec 05, 2020 3:30 am
- Forum: Beginners Help
- Topic: Re: FAT32 partition size limit is 2 Terabytes
- Replies: 11
- Views: 12699
Re: FAT32 partition size limit is 2 Terabytes
2TB+ ssd is tempting. I do not think I will have fat32 on the entire disk.
- Sat Dec 05, 2020 3:19 am
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Cannot run "SeaMonkey 2.53.5.1" on "Precise Light 5.7.2" using user spot
- Replies: 10
- Views: 833
Re: Cannot run "SeaMonkey 2.53.5.1" on "Precise Light 5.7.2" using user spot
I wonder if there is a missunderstanding of philosophy here.
The run-as-spot scripts does a bit more than changing ownership of the seamonkey files.
It also looks like you just unpacked seamonkey into a directory? Might work, I don't know. Try to run seamonkey like this:
cd your-seamonkey-path
run ...
The run-as-spot scripts does a bit more than changing ownership of the seamonkey files.
It also looks like you just unpacked seamonkey into a directory? Might work, I don't know. Try to run seamonkey like this:
cd your-seamonkey-path
run ...
- Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:03 am
- Forum: Users
- Topic: What improvements did Slacko6 make over Tahrpup?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 720
Re: What improvements did Slacko6 make over Tahrpup?
The biggest difference is the base. Slaco is build using slackware packages if memory does not fail me entirely. Thar on debian/ubuntu packages.
The slacko brand worked better for me for a long time. If I recall right sound and wifi worked at an early stage. Thar* failed in the first releases. Long ...
The slacko brand worked better for me for a long time. If I recall right sound and wifi worked at an early stage. Thar* failed in the first releases. Long ...
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:22 pm
- Forum: Users
- Topic: memtest86 and memmap
- Replies: 1
- Views: 431
Re: memtest86 and memmap
Looks like the smallest space I can lock is 1M.
So finally memmap=1M\$0x243860800 worked. I had to move it behind the module blacklist thought. So basically the last kernel parameter before puppy parameters.
Note that the faulty address is inside the first 1K starting from 0x243860800. To find ...
So finally memmap=1M\$0x243860800 worked. I had to move it behind the module blacklist thought. So basically the last kernel parameter before puppy parameters.
Note that the faulty address is inside the first 1K starting from 0x243860800. To find ...
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:16 pm
- Forum: Users
- Topic: memtest86 and memmap
- Replies: 1
- Views: 431
memtest86 and memmap
Does anyone have hints on how to use the results from memtest86+ with kernel parameter memmap ( https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt search for memmap= )?
Annoying as it is I have 3 faulty spots in my computers memmory. It started with frequent browser crashes ...
Annoying as it is I have 3 faulty spots in my computers memmory. It started with frequent browser crashes ...